From: Andre Vieira Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:28:02 +0000 (+0000) Subject: PR tree-optimization/92429 do not fold when updating epilogue statements X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f7dff7699fd70d3b8c3e637818e18c86f93ccfec;p=gcc.git PR tree-optimization/92429 do not fold when updating epilogue statements This patch addresses the problem reported in PR92429. When creating an epilogue for vectorization we have to replace the SSA_NAMEs in the PATTERN_DEF_SEQs and RELATED_STMTs of the epilogue's loop_vec_infos. When doing this we were using simplify_replace_tree which always folds the replacement. This may lead to a different tree-node than the one which was analyzed in vect_loop_analyze. In turn the new tree-node may require a different vectorization than the one we had prepared for which caused the ICE in question. gcc/ChangeLog: 2020-01-16 Andre Vieira PR tree-optimization/92429 * tree-ssa-loop-niter.h (simplify_replace_tree): Add parameter. * tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (simplify_replace_tree): Add parameter to control folding. * tree-vect-loop.c (update_epilogue_vinfo): Do not fold when replacing tree. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-01-16 Andre Vieira PR tree-optimization/92429 * gcc.dg/vect/pr92429.c: New test. --- diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 0642993ccf1..d21ec86a2dd 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +2020-01-16 Andre Vieira + + PR tree-optimization/92429 + * tree-ssa-loop-niter.h (simplify_replace_tree): Add parameter. + * tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (simplify_replace_tree): Add parameter to + control folding. + * tree-vect-loop.c (update_epilogue_vinfo): Do not fold when replacing + tree. + 2020-01-16 Richard Sandiford * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_split_sve_subreg_move): Apply diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index d6ba8d6474d..0d8aa6063a7 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2020-01-16 Andre Vieira + + PR tree-optimization/92429 + * gcc.dg/vect/pr92429.c: New test. + 2020-01-16 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/93253 diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c index 4d5e0494511..6e6df0bfdb8 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c @@ -1934,7 +1934,8 @@ number_of_iterations_cond (class loop *loop, tree simplify_replace_tree (tree expr, tree old, tree new_tree, - tree (*valueize) (tree, void*), void *context) + tree (*valueize) (tree, void*), void *context, + bool do_fold) { unsigned i, n; tree ret = NULL_TREE, e, se; @@ -1966,7 +1967,7 @@ simplify_replace_tree (tree expr, tree old, tree new_tree, for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { e = TREE_OPERAND (expr, i); - se = simplify_replace_tree (e, old, new_tree, valueize, context); + se = simplify_replace_tree (e, old, new_tree, valueize, context, do_fold); if (e == se) continue; @@ -1976,7 +1977,7 @@ simplify_replace_tree (tree expr, tree old, tree new_tree, TREE_OPERAND (ret, i) = se; } - return (ret ? fold (ret) : expr); + return (ret ? (do_fold ? fold (ret) : ret) : expr); } /* Expand definitions of ssa names in EXPR as long as they are simple diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.h b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.h index 621e2c2e28d..eb8d1579479 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.h +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.h @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ extern void free_numbers_of_iterations_estimates (class loop *); extern void free_numbers_of_iterations_estimates (function *); extern tree simplify_replace_tree (tree, tree, tree, tree (*)(tree, void *) = NULL, - void * = NULL); + void * = NULL, bool do_fold = true); extern void substitute_in_loop_info (class loop *, tree, tree); #endif /* GCC_TREE_SSA_LOOP_NITER_H */ diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c index 8e318a037a7..e5fb434bd4e 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c @@ -8434,8 +8434,13 @@ update_epilogue_loop_vinfo (class loop *epilogue, tree advance) gimple_set_op (stmt, j, *new_op); else { + /* PR92429: The last argument of simplify_replace_tree disables + folding when replacing arguments. This is required as + otherwise you might end up with different statements than the + ones analyzed in vect_loop_analyze, leading to different + vectorization. */ op = simplify_replace_tree (op, NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE, - &find_in_mapping, &mapping); + &find_in_mapping, &mapping, false); gimple_set_op (stmt, j, op); } }