From: Jacob Lifshay Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 01:35:00 +0000 (-0800) Subject: meeting suggested adding shaddw while keeping shadduw X-Git-Tag: opf_rfc_ls001_v3~226 X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fa2c125f4e5adfa7e9c4c9d6f46ef34e579f13ad;p=libreriscv.git meeting suggested adding shaddw while keeping shadduw --- diff --git a/openpower/sv/rfc/ls004.mdwn b/openpower/sv/rfc/ls004.mdwn index 8cedcdc36..008ab56f9 100644 --- a/openpower/sv/rfc/ls004.mdwn +++ b/openpower/sv/rfc/ls004.mdwn @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ * bigint: TODO: maybe remove this link due to confusion and irrelevance? * * shift-and-add -* +* add shaddw: **Severity**: Major @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Replaces a pair of explicit instructions in hot-loops. and zero-extended. 3. Both are 2-in 1-out instructions. -TODO: signed 32-bit shift-and-add should probably be added or replace shadduw, this needs to be addressed before submitting the RFC: +TODO: signed 32-bit shift-and-add should be added, this needs to be addressed before submitting the RFC: **Changes**