From: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 03:03:22 +0000 (-0600) Subject: Move some code later in backtrace_command_1 X-Git-Url: https://git.libre-soc.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fb7eb8b5826f059e2b7a18e42ff9c20972e626bc;p=binutils-gdb.git Move some code later in backtrace_command_1 PR backtrace/15584 notes that some code in backtrace_command_1 is not useful when frame filters are in use. This patch moves this code into the no-frame-filters "if". This also removes the unused local "trailing_level", which I noticed while moving the code around. gdb/ChangeLog 2018-03-26 Tom Tromey PR backtrace/15584: * stack.c (backtrace_command_1): Move some code into no-filters "if". --- diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 59d7bb8186f..4a9b87b73be 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2018-03-26 Tom Tromey + + PR backtrace/15584: + * stack.c (backtrace_command_1): Move some code into no-filters + "if". + 2018-03-26 Tom Tromey * python/py-framefilter.c (throw_quit_or_print_exception): New diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c index 8e8fe12109f..16f7931be17 100644 --- a/gdb/stack.c +++ b/gdb/stack.c @@ -1698,49 +1698,17 @@ backtrace_command_1 (const char *count_exp, frame_filter_flags flags, struct frame_info *fi; int count; int i; - struct frame_info *trailing; - int trailing_level, py_start = 0, py_end = 0; + int py_start = 0, py_end = 0; enum ext_lang_bt_status result = EXT_LANG_BT_ERROR; if (!target_has_stack) error (_("No stack.")); - /* The following code must do two things. First, it must set the - variable TRAILING to the frame from which we should start - printing. Second, it must set the variable count to the number - of frames which we should print, or -1 if all of them. */ - trailing = get_current_frame (); - - trailing_level = 0; if (count_exp) { count = parse_and_eval_long (count_exp); if (count < 0) - { - struct frame_info *current; - - py_start = count; - count = -count; - - current = trailing; - while (current && count--) - { - QUIT; - current = get_prev_frame (current); - } - - /* Will stop when CURRENT reaches the top of the stack. - TRAILING will be COUNT below it. */ - while (current) - { - QUIT; - trailing = get_prev_frame (trailing); - current = get_prev_frame (current); - trailing_level++; - } - - count = -1; - } + py_start = count; else { py_start = 0; @@ -1755,24 +1723,6 @@ backtrace_command_1 (const char *count_exp, frame_filter_flags flags, count = -1; } - if (info_verbose) - { - /* Read in symbols for all of the frames. Need to do this in a - separate pass so that "Reading in symbols for xxx" messages - don't screw up the appearance of the backtrace. Also if - people have strong opinions against reading symbols for - backtrace this may have to be an option. */ - i = count; - for (fi = trailing; fi != NULL && i--; fi = get_prev_frame (fi)) - { - CORE_ADDR pc; - - QUIT; - pc = get_frame_address_in_block (fi); - expand_symtab_containing_pc (pc, find_pc_mapped_section (pc)); - } - } - if (! no_filters) { enum ext_lang_frame_args arg_type; @@ -1797,6 +1747,57 @@ backtrace_command_1 (const char *count_exp, frame_filter_flags flags, "no-filters" has been specified from the command. */ if (no_filters || result == EXT_LANG_BT_NO_FILTERS) { + struct frame_info *trailing; + + /* The following code must do two things. First, it must set the + variable TRAILING to the frame from which we should start + printing. Second, it must set the variable count to the number + of frames which we should print, or -1 if all of them. */ + trailing = get_current_frame (); + + if (count_exp != NULL && count < 0) + { + struct frame_info *current; + + count = -count; + + current = trailing; + while (current && count--) + { + QUIT; + current = get_prev_frame (current); + } + + /* Will stop when CURRENT reaches the top of the stack. + TRAILING will be COUNT below it. */ + while (current) + { + QUIT; + trailing = get_prev_frame (trailing); + current = get_prev_frame (current); + } + + count = -1; + } + + if (info_verbose) + { + /* Read in symbols for all of the frames. Need to do this in a + separate pass so that "Reading in symbols for xxx" messages + don't screw up the appearance of the backtrace. Also if + people have strong opinions against reading symbols for + backtrace this may have to be an option. */ + i = count; + for (fi = trailing; fi != NULL && i--; fi = get_prev_frame (fi)) + { + CORE_ADDR pc; + + QUIT; + pc = get_frame_address_in_block (fi); + expand_symtab_containing_pc (pc, find_pc_mapped_section (pc)); + } + } + for (i = 0, fi = trailing; fi && count--; i++, fi = get_prev_frame (fi)) { QUIT;