From 168a3b8627861fbb2786839f7e276de82f883e42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Paul <brianp@vmware.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:30:30 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] pipebuffer: split up assertion

The problem with assert(a && b) is you don't know which term is zero
when there's a failure.
---
 src/gallium/auxiliary/pipebuffer/pb_bufmgr_debug.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipebuffer/pb_bufmgr_debug.c b/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipebuffer/pb_bufmgr_debug.c
index 2ea63d6cc79..567303aa55e 100644
--- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipebuffer/pb_bufmgr_debug.c
+++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipebuffer/pb_bufmgr_debug.c
@@ -210,7 +210,8 @@ pb_debug_buffer_check(struct pb_debug_buffer *buf)
       if(underflow || overflow)
          debug_backtrace_dump(buf->create_backtrace, PB_DEBUG_CREATE_BACKTRACE);
 
-      debug_assert(!underflow && !overflow);
+      debug_assert(!underflow);
+      debug_assert(!overflow);
 
       /* re-fill if not aborted */
       if(underflow)
-- 
2.30.2