From 021d427d3f0dd5afd18fe67f75e5ddcbb0afd17d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anton Blanchard Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 16:00:36 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] Stores need to wait for wishbone write ack I wasn't waiting to get a wishbone ack back on stores before continuing. This creates all sorts of problems when we add pipelining and send loads and stores down the pipe faster. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard --- loadstore2.vhdl | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/loadstore2.vhdl b/loadstore2.vhdl index ac63bca..9ac8c7b 100644 --- a/loadstore2.vhdl +++ b/loadstore2.vhdl @@ -81,16 +81,15 @@ begin m_tmp.cyc <= '1'; m_tmp.stb <= '1'; + l_saved <= l_in; + if l_in.load = '1' then m_tmp.we <= '0'; - l_saved <= l_in; state <= WAITING_FOR_READ_ACK; else m_tmp.we <= '1'; - w_tmp.valid <= '1'; - data := l_in.data; if l_in.byte_reverse = '1' then data := byte_reverse(data, to_integer(unsigned(l_in.length))); @@ -100,12 +99,6 @@ begin assert l_in.sign_extend = '0' report "sign extension doesn't make sense for stores" severity failure; - if l_in.update = '1' then - w_tmp.write_enable <= '1'; - w_tmp.write_reg <= l_in.update_reg; - w_tmp.write_data <= l_in.addr; - end if; - state <= WAITING_FOR_WRITE_ACK; end if; end if; @@ -154,6 +147,13 @@ begin when WAITING_FOR_WRITE_ACK => if m_in.ack = '1' then + w_tmp.valid <= '1'; + if l_saved.update = '1' then + w_tmp.write_enable <= '1'; + w_tmp.write_reg <= l_saved.update_reg; + w_tmp.write_data <= l_saved.addr; + end if; + m_tmp <= wishbone_master_out_init; state <= IDLE; end if; -- 2.30.2