From 092edb719c973cccbbe443dd91612a98ef7bfbb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 02:39:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c: xfail scan for mmix. Looking at the dump and the test, I guess all "64-bit targets" fail the test for the reasons seen in the comment just above the dg-final, whose last two lines make it to the patch context. Maybe the xfail target list can be shortened by removing most targets and use just "lp64". That doesn't cover it passing on x86_64 and s390x-zarch though. gcc/testsuite: * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c: xfail scan for mmix. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c index e4daa9d4ff3..a879d305971 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c @@ -27,4 +27,4 @@ foo () but the loop reads only one element at a time, and DOM cannot resolve these. The same happens on powerpc depending on the SIMD support available. */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 28;" "optimized" { xfail { { alpha*-*-* hppa*64*-*-* nvptx*-*-* } || { { { lp64 && { powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* riscv*-*-* } } || aarch64_sve } || { arm*-*-* && { ! arm_neon } } } } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 28;" "optimized" { xfail { { alpha*-*-* hppa*64*-*-* nvptx*-*-* mmix-knuth-mmixware } || { { { lp64 && { powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* riscv*-*-* } } || aarch64_sve } || { arm*-*-* && { ! arm_neon } } } } } } } */ -- 2.30.2