From 0e053c37ab9fa00c31a2feaec247d1d217324a09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: lkcl Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:35:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] --- simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst b/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst index 79cdb75e6..f174f7b08 100644 --- a/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst +++ b/simple_v_extension/specification/mv.x.rst @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ -= MV.X and MV.swizzle +MV.X and MV.swizzle +=================== swizzle needs a MV. see below for a potential way to use the funct7 to do a swizzle in rs2. @@ -49,7 +50,8 @@ potential MV.X? register-version of MV-swizzle? question: do we need a swizzle MV.X as well? -= macro-op fusion +macro-op fusion +=============== there is the potential for macro-op fusion of mv-swizzle with the following instruction. -- 2.30.2