From 10a51b218ffe05c48d43143bd676830191a72efa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Love Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 10:41:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Formatting changes from Craig. From-SVN: r23713 --- gcc/f/bugs.texi | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/f/bugs.texi b/gcc/f/bugs.texi index af18d80cdbc..b591cfce04b 100644 --- a/gcc/f/bugs.texi +++ b/gcc/f/bugs.texi @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ Version 0.6 should solve most or all remaining problems @cindex COMPLEX support @cindex support, COMPLEX @item -Maintainers of gcc report that the back end definitely has ``broken'' +Maintainers of @code{gcc} report that the back end definitely has ``broken'' support for @code{COMPLEX} types. Based on their input, it seems many of the problems affect only the more-general facilities for gcc's @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ by versions of @code{g77} prior to 0.5.20. when using the @samp{-fPIC} option (such as compiling for ELF targets) on the Intel x86 architecture target. The symptom is that the assembler complains about invalid opcodes. -This bug is in the gcc back end. +This bug is in the @code{gcc} back end. Fixed in @code{egcs} version 1.0.2. -- 2.30.2