From 147d994bcdd36a177e49e7b6ac8d9c1f7b4cdcf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Clifton Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:49:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix seg-fault when running garbage collection on coff binaries. PR ld/20401 * coffgen.c (fini_reloc_cookie_rels): Check for the extistence of the coff_section_data before using it. --- bfd/ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ bfd/coffgen.c | 8 +++++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bfd/ChangeLog b/bfd/ChangeLog index 077917801b1..ba48136a547 100644 --- a/bfd/ChangeLog +++ b/bfd/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2016-07-27 Ozkan Sezer + Nick Clifton + + PR ld/20401 + * coffgen.c (fini_reloc_cookie_rels): Check for the extistence + of the coff_section_data before using it. + 2016-07-26 Maciej W. Rozycki * elfxx-mips.c (mips_elf_calculate_relocation): Handle branches diff --git a/bfd/coffgen.c b/bfd/coffgen.c index 56864cacb2c..75512fbd7d1 100644 --- a/bfd/coffgen.c +++ b/bfd/coffgen.c @@ -2691,7 +2691,13 @@ static void fini_reloc_cookie_rels (struct coff_reloc_cookie *cookie, asection *sec) { - if (cookie->rels && coff_section_data (NULL, sec)->relocs != cookie->rels) + if (cookie->rels + /* PR 20401. The relocs may not have been cached, so check first. + If the relocs were loaded by init_reloc_cookie_rels() then this + will be the case. FIXME: Would performance be improved if the + relocs *were* cached ? */ + && coff_section_data (NULL, sec) + && coff_section_data (NULL, sec)->relocs != cookie->rels) free (cookie->rels); } -- 2.30.2