From 1b536f04b94ca3e7821a151553397d04a789aa54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Brobecker Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:33:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * ada-lang.c: Apply some corrections to the previous comment addition. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gdb/ada-lang.c | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 86810b33a63..64b8603feee 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2009-11-27 Joel Brobecker + + * ada-lang.c: Apply some corrections to the previous comment addition. + 2009-11-26 Joel Brobecker * ada-lang.c: Update the comment explaining how to evaluate diff --git a/gdb/ada-lang.c b/gdb/ada-lang.c index c4e00f37ad0..9594d6d601a 100644 --- a/gdb/ada-lang.c +++ b/gdb/ada-lang.c @@ -8480,15 +8480,15 @@ ada_value_cast (struct type *type, struct value *arg2, enum noside noside) Arrays are a little simpler to handle than records, because the same amount of memory is allocated for each element of the array, even if - the amount of space actually used by each element changes from element + the amount of space actually used by each element differs from element to element. Consider for instance the following array of type Rec: type Rec_Array is array (1 .. 2) of Rec; - The actual amount of memory occupied by each element might change - from element to element, depending on the their discriminant value. + The actual amount of memory occupied by each element might be different + from element to element, depending on the value of their discriminant. But the amount of space reserved for each element in the array remains - constant regardless. So we simply need to compute that size using + fixed regardless. So we simply need to compute that size using the debugging information available, from which we can then determine the array size (we multiply the number of elements of the array by the size of each element). @@ -8512,7 +8512,7 @@ ada_value_cast (struct type *type, struct value *arg2, enum noside noside) that we also use the adjective "aligner" in our code to designate these wrapper types. - In some cases, the size of allocated for each element is statically + In some cases, the size allocated for each element is statically known. In that case, the PAD type already has the correct size, and the array element should remain unfixed. -- 2.30.2