From 2029e13917d53d2289d3ebb390c4f40bd2112d21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nelson Chu Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:09:06 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Clarify the behaviors of SET/ADD/SUB relocations. We are used to generate these kinds of relocations by data directives. Considering the following example, .word (A + 3) - (B + 2) The GAS will generate a pair of ADD/SUB for this, R_RISCV_ADD, A + 1 R_RISCV_SUB, 0 The addend of R_RISCV_SUB will always be zero, and the summary of the constants will be stored in the addend of R_RISCV_ADD/SET. Therefore, we can always add the addend of these data relocations when doing relocations. But unfortunately, I had heard that if we are using .reloc to generate the data relocations will make the relocations failed. Refer to this, .reloc offset, R_RISCV_ADD32, A + 3 .reloc offset, R_RISCV_SUB32, B + 2 .word 0 Then we can get the relocations as follows, R_RISCV_ADD, A + 3 R_RISCV_SUB, B + 2 Then... Current LD does the relocation, B - A + 3 + 2, which is wrong obviously... So first of all, this patch fixes the wrong relocation behavior of R_RISCV_SUB* relocations. Afterwards, considering the uleb128 direcitve, we will get a pair of SET_ULEB128/SUB_ULEB128 relocations for it for now, .uleb128 (A + 3) - (B + 2) R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128, A + 1 R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128, B + 1 Which looks also wrong obviously, the summary of the constants should only be stored into the addend of SET_ULEB128, and the addend of SUB_ULEB128 should be zero like other SUB relocations. But the current LD will still get the right relocation values since we only add the addend of SUB_ULEB128 by accident... Anyway, this patch also fixes the behaviors above, to make sure that no matter using .uleb128 or .reloc directives, we should always get the right values. bfd/ * elfnn-riscv.c (perform_relocation): Clarify that SUB relocations should substract the addend, rather than add. (riscv_elf_relocate_section): Since SET_ULEB128 won't go into perform_relocation, we should add it's addend here in advance. gas/ * config/tc-riscv.c (riscv_insert_uleb128_fixes): Set the addend of SUB_ULEB128 to zero since it should already be added into the addend of SET_ULEB128. --- bfd/elfnn-riscv.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ gas/config/tc-riscv.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c index 3edf68e3e30..00e5c69dbec 100644 --- a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c +++ b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c @@ -1737,7 +1737,20 @@ perform_relocation (const reloc_howto_type *howto, { if (howto->pc_relative) value -= sec_addr (input_section) + rel->r_offset; - value += rel->r_addend; + + switch (ELFNN_R_TYPE (rel->r_info)) + { + case R_RISCV_SUB6: + case R_RISCV_SUB8: + case R_RISCV_SUB16: + case R_RISCV_SUB32: + case R_RISCV_SUB64: + case R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128: + value -= rel->r_addend; + break; + default: + value += rel->r_addend; + } switch (ELFNN_R_TYPE (rel->r_info)) { @@ -1818,10 +1831,7 @@ perform_relocation (const reloc_howto_type *howto, value = ENCODE_CITYPE_LUI_IMM (RISCV_CONST_HIGH_PART (value)); break; - /* SUB_ULEB128 must be applied after SET_ULEB128, so we only write the - value back for SUB_ULEB128 should be enough. */ - case R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128: - break; + /* R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128 won't go into here. */ case R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128: { unsigned int len = 0; @@ -2523,7 +2533,7 @@ riscv_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd, if (uleb128_set_rel != NULL && uleb128_set_rel->r_offset == rel->r_offset) { - relocation = uleb128_set_vma - relocation; + relocation = uleb128_set_vma - relocation + uleb128_set_rel->r_addend; uleb128_set_vma = 0; uleb128_set_rel = NULL; } diff --git a/gas/config/tc-riscv.c b/gas/config/tc-riscv.c index 5759d3a5fc4..09f2ea17c17 100644 --- a/gas/config/tc-riscv.c +++ b/gas/config/tc-riscv.c @@ -4999,6 +4999,7 @@ riscv_insert_uleb128_fixes (bfd *abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, fix_new_exp (fragP, fragP->fr_fix, 0, exp_dup, 0, BFD_RELOC_RISCV_SET_ULEB128); exp_dup->X_add_symbol = exp->X_op_symbol; + exp_dup->X_add_number = 0; /* Set addend of SUB_ULEB128 to zero. */ fix_new_exp (fragP, fragP->fr_fix, 0, exp_dup, 0, BFD_RELOC_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128); free ((void *) exp_dup); -- 2.30.2