From 20fcd1747993127c648b9a3ad393a6caa3a025ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Tromey Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 08:28:01 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Pass correct name to @value in gdb.texinfo I noticed a couple instance of this warning when rebuilding the gdb info files: warning: undefined flag: GDB The problem is that the wrong argument was passed to @value. This patch fixes the problem. --- gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo index 4bc83ed2168..a179af77224 100644 --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo @@ -5972,8 +5972,8 @@ Handle the output by calling a function in your program (normally @code{printf}). When using this style the supported format specifiers depend entirely on the function being called. -Most of @value{GDB}'s format specifiers align with those supported by -the @code{printf} function, however, @value{GDB}'s @samp{%V} format +Most of @value{GDBN}'s format specifiers align with those supported by +the @code{printf} function, however, @value{GDBN}'s @samp{%V} format specifier extension is not supported by @code{printf}. When using @samp{call} style dprintf, care should be taken to ensure that only format specifiers supported by the output function are used, otherwise -- 2.30.2