From 219b43c612b2882e0bf82ac1a12ff073a42be6e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Turner Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:40:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] i965/fs: Don't emit null MOVs in CSE. We'd like to CSE some instructions, like CMP, that often have null destinations. Instead of replacing them with MOVs to null, just don't emit the MOV. Reviewed-by: Paul Berry --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_cse.cpp | 42 ++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_cse.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_cse.cpp index 0afc5f65f6e..3f59339f716 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_cse.cpp +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_cse.cpp @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ fs_visitor::opt_cse_local(bblock_t *block, exec_list *aeb) * If we don't have a temporary already, make one. */ bool no_existing_temp = entry->tmp.file == BAD_FILE; - if (no_existing_temp) { + if (no_existing_temp && !entry->generator->dst.is_null()) { int written = entry->generator->regs_written; fs_reg orig_dst = entry->generator->dst; @@ -171,29 +171,37 @@ fs_visitor::opt_cse_local(bblock_t *block, exec_list *aeb) } /* dest <- temp */ - int written = inst->regs_written; - assert(written == entry->generator->regs_written); - assert(inst->dst.type == entry->tmp.type); - fs_reg dst = inst->dst; - fs_reg tmp = entry->tmp; - fs_inst *copy = NULL; - for (int i = 0; i < written; i++) { - copy = MOV(dst, tmp); - copy->force_writemask_all = inst->force_writemask_all; - inst->insert_before(copy); - - dst.reg_offset++; - tmp.reg_offset++; + if (!inst->dst.is_null()) { + int written = inst->regs_written; + assert(written == entry->generator->regs_written); + assert(inst->dst.type == entry->tmp.type); + fs_reg dst = inst->dst; + fs_reg tmp = entry->tmp; + fs_inst *copy = NULL; + for (int i = 0; i < written; i++) { + copy = MOV(dst, tmp); + copy->force_writemask_all = inst->force_writemask_all; + inst->insert_before(copy); + + dst.reg_offset++; + tmp.reg_offset++; + } } + + /* Set our iterator so that next time through the loop inst->next + * will get the instruction in the basic block after the one we've + * removed. + */ + fs_inst *prev = (fs_inst *)inst->prev; + inst->remove(); /* Appending an instruction may have changed our bblock end. */ if (inst == block->end) { - block->end = copy; + block->end = prev; } - /* Continue iteration with copy->next */ - inst = copy; + inst = prev; } } -- 2.30.2