From 23c73aa3b7a368b2007151eccbb53b33fe0386b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Carlton Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:11:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 2004-03-17 David Carlton * gdb.cp/classes.exp (test_enums): Refer to PR c++/1588 instead of PR c++/826. --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog index 4f1377e990c..1dcd2017cf6 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2004-03-17 David Carlton + + * gdb.cp/classes.exp (test_enums): Refer to PR c++/1588 instead of + PR c++/826. + 2004-03-16 Roland McGrath * gdb.base/auxv.exp: New file. diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp index 0b723e591f6..d4e78c11927 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ proc test_enums {} { } # I'll do this test two different ways, because of a parser bug. - # See PR gdb/826. + # See PR gdb/1588. gdb_test_multiple "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" { -re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" { @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ proc test_enums {} { -re "A (parse|syntax) error in expression, near `42'.$nl$gdb_prompt $" { # "parse error" is bison 1.35. # "syntax error" is bison 1.875. - kfail "gdb/826" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" + kfail "gdb/1588" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" } } -- 2.30.2