From 263f8654f79905bda3a50504420d38303918e9e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cesar_Strauss <Cesar_Strauss@web>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 16:06:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update my tasks, ordered by priority

---
 Cesar_Strauss.mdwn | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Cesar_Strauss.mdwn b/Cesar_Strauss.mdwn
index 1d073ec3c..81d74613a 100644
--- a/Cesar_Strauss.mdwn
+++ b/Cesar_Strauss.mdwn
@@ -6,5 +6,29 @@ Contributor
 
 ## Currently working on
 
-* <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318>
-	* fix LDSTCompUnit
+1. ALU CompUnit needs to recognise that RA (src1) can be zero  
+	<https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336>  
+	Status: not started
+
+2. Something about the above (5), being optional.  
+	<https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336#c5>  
+	Status: not started
+
+3. Code-morph LDSTCompUnit to use RecordObject structure, like CompUnitALU  
+	<https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318#c18>  
+	Status: Need a review of Luke's implementation, compared to mine.
+
+4. Test dual ports (two L0CacheBuffer with two ports, 4-4 as well) which
+write to the same memory  
+	<https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318#c11>  
+	Status: not started
+
+5. Luke tried two LDs in the score6600 code - they failed.  
+	<https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318#c17>  
+	Status: not started, need to check the [prototype] L0CacheBuffer
+
+6. Fix a bug in the LDSTCompUnit  
+	<https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318>  
+	Status: Luke thinks he fixed it, but needs a review and improving the
+unit tests. See: <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318#c7>
+
-- 
2.30.2