From 2d4d40105e9b56a5c1539726a9fdfbea7a932fa2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: lkcl Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:15:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- openpower/sv/predication.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/openpower/sv/predication.mdwn b/openpower/sv/predication.mdwn index 6af4c9cad..002967d3b 100644 --- a/openpower/sv/predication.mdwn +++ b/openpower/sv/predication.mdwn @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ One of the design principles of SV is that the use of VL should be as closrly eq The implications here are that *register dependency hazards still have to be respected inter-element*. -Using a multi-issue out-of-order engine as the underlying microarchitectural basis this is not as difficult to achieve as it first seems (the hard work habing been done by the Dependency Matrices). In addition, Vector Chaining should also be possible for a multi-issue out-of-order rngine to cope with, as long as false (unnecessary) Dependency Hazards are not introduced in between Vectors, where the dependencies actually only exist between elements *in* the Vector. +Using a multi-issue out-of-order engine as the underlying microarchitectural basis this is not as difficult to achieve as it first seems (the hard work habing been done by the Dependency Matrices). In addition, Vector Chaining should also be possible for a multi-issue out-of-order engine to cope with, as long as false (unnecessary) Dependency Hazards are not introduced in between Vectors, where the dependencies actually only exist between elements *in* the Vector. The concept of recognising that it is the elements within the Vector that have Dependency Hazards rather than the Vectors themselves is what permits Cray-style "chaining". -- 2.30.2