From 2db2d57137d83f9a8ec906fbc940592283c4648a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Brobecker Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 19:37:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * gdb.ada/array_return.exp: Mark the last test as expected to fail on hppa32 targets. --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/array_return.exp | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog index bb6a50196fb..069d3f67a01 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2006-02-07 Joel Brobecker + + * gdb.ada/array_return.exp: Mark the last test as expected to fail + on hppa32 targets. + 2006-02-06 Vladimir Prus * gdb.mi/mi-break.exp, gdb.mi/mi2-break.exp: Test for the fullname diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/array_return.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/array_return.exp index 72d8fde47db..c2ede2c9319 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/array_return.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/array_return.exp @@ -72,6 +72,14 @@ gdb_test "cont" \ "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, pck.create_large \\(\\).*" \ "Continuing to Create.Large" +# On hppa32, the value returned is too large to be returned via a register. +# Instead, it is returned using the struct convention, and the debugger +# unfortunately cannot find the address of the result. The following +# test is therefore expected to fail for all hppa targets except hppa64. +if { ! [istarget "hppa*64*-*-*"] } then { + setup_xfail "hppa*-*-*" +} + gdb_test "finish" \ "Value returned is \\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(2, 2, 2, 2\\)" \ "value printed by finish of Create_Large" -- 2.30.2