From 33a6020f2ecb51ff4bfa93deaf4ca2f9d044a094 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Korey Sewell <ksewell@umich.edu>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:43:40 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] alpha: naming for dtb faults Just "dfault" gets confusing
 while debugging. Why not differentiate whether it's an access violation or
 page fault

---
 src/arch/alpha/faults.cc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/arch/alpha/faults.cc b/src/arch/alpha/faults.cc
index 4f84a151a..b6a0d965e 100644
--- a/src/arch/alpha/faults.cc
+++ b/src/arch/alpha/faults.cc
@@ -71,11 +71,11 @@ FaultName PDtbMissFault::_name = "dtb_miss_double";
 FaultVect PDtbMissFault::_vect = 0x0281;
 FaultStat PDtbMissFault::_count;
 
-FaultName DtbPageFault::_name = "dfault";
+FaultName DtbPageFault::_name = "dtb_page_fault";
 FaultVect DtbPageFault::_vect = 0x0381;
 FaultStat DtbPageFault::_count;
 
-FaultName DtbAcvFault::_name = "dfault";
+FaultName DtbAcvFault::_name = "dtb_acv_fault";
 FaultVect DtbAcvFault::_vect = 0x0381;
 FaultStat DtbAcvFault::_count;
 
-- 
2.30.2