From 3971cdfd328985421f74fe2646ba64bb6c74f9ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:00:41 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] glibc: drop stray from merge/bump Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard --- package/glibc/2.19/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch | 88 --------------------- package/glibc/Config.in | 1 - 2 files changed, 89 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 package/glibc/2.19/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch diff --git a/package/glibc/2.19/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch b/package/glibc/2.19/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch deleted file mode 100644 index b2f8e49d46..0000000000 --- a/package/glibc/2.19/0004-CVE-2015-1472.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,88 +0,0 @@ -Fix CVE-2015-1472 - heap buffer overflow in wscanf -Backport from upstream: -https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5bd80bfe9ca0d955bfbbc002781bc7b01b6bcb06 -See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188235 - -Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias - -diff --git a/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c b/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c -index aece3f2..8a2eb9e 100644 ---- a/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c -+++ b/stdio-common/tst-sscanf.c -@@ -233,5 +233,38 @@ main (void) - } - } - -+ /* BZ #16618 -+ The test will segfault during SSCANF if the buffer overflow -+ is not fixed. The size of `s` is such that it forces the use -+ of malloc internally and this triggers the incorrect computation. -+ Thus the value for SIZE is arbitrariy high enough that malloc -+ is used. */ -+ { -+#define SIZE 131072 -+ CHAR *s = malloc ((SIZE + 1) * sizeof (*s)); -+ if (s == NULL) -+ abort (); -+ for (size_t i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) -+ s[i] = L('0'); -+ s[SIZE] = L('\0'); -+ int i = 42; -+ /* Scan multi-digit zero into `i`. */ -+ if (SSCANF (s, L("%d"), &i) != 1) -+ { -+ printf ("FAIL: bug16618: SSCANF did not read one input item.\n"); -+ result = 1; -+ } -+ if (i != 0) -+ { -+ printf ("FAIL: bug16618: Value of `i` was not zero as expected.\n"); -+ result = 1; -+ } -+ free (s); -+ if (result != 1) -+ printf ("PASS: bug16618: Did not crash.\n"); -+#undef SIZE -+ } -+ -+ - return result; - } -diff --git a/stdio-common/vfscanf.c b/stdio-common/vfscanf.c -index cd129a8..0e204e7 100644 ---- a/stdio-common/vfscanf.c -+++ b/stdio-common/vfscanf.c -@@ -272,9 +272,10 @@ _IO_vfscanf_internal (_IO_FILE *s, const char *format, _IO_va_list argptr, - if (__glibc_unlikely (wpsize == wpmax)) \ - { \ - CHAR_T *old = wp; \ -- size_t newsize = (UCHAR_MAX + 1 > 2 * wpmax \ -- ? UCHAR_MAX + 1 : 2 * wpmax); \ -- if (use_malloc || !__libc_use_alloca (newsize)) \ -+ bool fits = __glibc_likely (wpmax <= SIZE_MAX / sizeof (CHAR_T) / 2); \ -+ size_t wpneed = MAX (UCHAR_MAX + 1, 2 * wpmax); \ -+ size_t newsize = fits ? wpneed * sizeof (CHAR_T) : SIZE_MAX; \ -+ if (!__libc_use_alloca (newsize)) \ - { \ - wp = realloc (use_malloc ? wp : NULL, newsize); \ - if (wp == NULL) \ -@@ -286,14 +287,13 @@ _IO_vfscanf_internal (_IO_FILE *s, const char *format, _IO_va_list argptr, - } \ - if (! use_malloc) \ - MEMCPY (wp, old, wpsize); \ -- wpmax = newsize; \ -+ wpmax = wpneed; \ - use_malloc = true; \ - } \ - else \ - { \ - size_t s = wpmax * sizeof (CHAR_T); \ -- wp = (CHAR_T *) extend_alloca (wp, s, \ -- newsize * sizeof (CHAR_T)); \ -+ wp = (CHAR_T *) extend_alloca (wp, s, newsize); \ - wpmax = s / sizeof (CHAR_T); \ - if (old != NULL) \ - MEMCPY (wp, old, wpsize); \ --- -1.9.4 - diff --git a/package/glibc/Config.in b/package/glibc/Config.in index 80014910b0..1dd22c910c 100644 --- a/package/glibc/Config.in +++ b/package/glibc/Config.in @@ -47,6 +47,5 @@ config BR2_GLIBC_VERSION_STRING string default "2.18-svnr23787" if BR2_EGLIBC_VERSION_2_18 default "2.19-svnr25243" if BR2_EGLIBC_VERSION_2_19 - default "2.19" if BR2_GLIBC_VERSION_2_19 default "2.20" if BR2_GLIBC_VERSION_2_20 default "2.21" if BR2_GLIBC_VERSION_2_21 -- 2.30.2