From 41d7671d53d6e75f9c3b52e09e7079a90083f482 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Kingdon Date: Tue, 25 Jan 1994 17:42:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * stabs.texinfo (String Field): Discuss continuing stabs with ?. --- gdb/doc/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/doc/ChangeLog b/gdb/doc/ChangeLog index fd1e46c5162..00f11a56484 100644 --- a/gdb/doc/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/doc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +Tue Jan 25 12:12:04 1994 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com) + + * stabs.texinfo (String Field): Discuss continuing stabs with ?. + Wed Jan 19 06:39:24 1994 David J. Mackenzie (djm@thepub.cygnus.com) * stabs.texinfo (Non-Stab Symbol Types): Mention N_SET* | N_EXT. diff --git a/gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo b/gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo index 4e4a7067d80..b5beccb76d3 100644 --- a/gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo +++ b/gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo @@ -282,7 +282,9 @@ except the string field. The string field of every stab except the last is marked as continued with a backslash at the end (in the assembly code this may be written as a double backslash, depending on the assembler). Removing the backslashes and concatenating the string fields of each -stab produces the original, long string. +stab produces the original, long string. Just to be incompatible (or so +they don't have to worry about what the assembler does with +backslashes), AIX can use @samp{?} instead of backslash. @node C Example @section A Simple Example in C Source -- 2.30.2