From 444dc919334ea46574534285ae4b4b025c0d44f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:26:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] add summary slide --- pinmux/pinmux_chennai_2018.tex | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/pinmux/pinmux_chennai_2018.tex b/pinmux/pinmux_chennai_2018.tex index f467cb79b..05ab68b9d 100644 --- a/pinmux/pinmux_chennai_2018.tex +++ b/pinmux/pinmux_chennai_2018.tex @@ -341,19 +341,17 @@ \frame{\frametitle{Summary} \begin{itemize} + \item Value of Libre/Open pimux dramatically underestimated\\ + (and does not presently exist: SiFive IOF not suitable) + \item {\bf Only current option: license a commercial Pinmux } \item Actual muxing, like SRAM cells, is deceptively simple - \vspace{10pt} \item Actual pinmuxes are enormous: auto-generation essential - \vspace{10pt} \item HDLs completely unsuited to auto-generation task\\ (TRM, docs): { \bf Modern OO language features needed} - \vspace{10pt} \item Scenario Analysis / Verification and auto-generation of different HDLs far easier in a Modern OO language - \vspace{10pt} \item Standardisation for RISC-V saves implementors from huge duplication cost (HDL, firmware, docs, maintenance) - \vspace{10pt} \item { \bf Ultimately it's about saving money and reducing risk } \end{itemize} } -- 2.30.2