From 46ecd52745f46247ab5e2c3b6ccda8bc3458242d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pedro Alves Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:00:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Thread-specific breakpoints: say "no longer in the thread list" instead of "gone". It seems "gone" may confuse people, while that was exactly what it was trying to avoid. Switch to saying "no longer in the thread list", which is really the predicate GDB uses. gdb/ 2013-10-07 Pedro Alves PR breakpoints/11568 * breakpoint.c (remove_threaded_breakpoints): Say "no longer in the thread list" instead of "gone". --- gdb/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ gdb/breakpoint.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index a433b466939..9c3d419631c 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2013-10-07 Pedro Alves + + PR breakpoints/11568 + * breakpoint.c (remove_threaded_breakpoints): Say "no longer in + the thread list" instead of "gone". + 2013-10-06 Sergio Durigan Junior * NEWS: Mention new convenience variable $_exitsignal. diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c index b98ca9e100e..d3e9e496f09 100644 --- a/gdb/breakpoint.c +++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c @@ -2943,7 +2943,7 @@ remove_threaded_breakpoints (struct thread_info *tp, int silent) b->disposition = disp_del_at_next_stop; printf_filtered (_("\ -Thread-specific breakpoint %d deleted - thread %d is gone.\n"), +Thread-specific breakpoint %d deleted - thread %d no longer in the thread list.\n"), b->number, tp->num); /* Hide it from the user. */ -- 2.30.2