From 4f668aaedf266124b54892a7e3eb810861d973d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 12:48:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] clarify --- openpower/sv/rfc/ls001.mdwn | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/openpower/sv/rfc/ls001.mdwn b/openpower/sv/rfc/ls001.mdwn index 68d38ca5e..75dfc0655 100644 --- a/openpower/sv/rfc/ls001.mdwn +++ b/openpower/sv/rfc/ls001.mdwn @@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ such large numbers of registers, even for Multi-Issue microarchitectures. * No new Interrupt types are required. (**No modifications to existing Power ISA are required either**). -* GPR FPR and CR Field Register numbers are extended to 128. - A future version may extend to 256 or beyond [^extend][^futurevsx] +* GPR FPR and CR Field Register numbers are extended to 128. A future + version may extend to 256 or beyond or also extend VSX[^extend][^futurevsx] * 24-bits are needed within the main SVP64 Prefix (equivalent to a 2-bit XO) * Another 24-bit (a second 2-bit XO) is needed for a planned future encoding, currently named "SVP64-Single" [^likeext001] @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ operations. [[!tag opf_rfc]] -[^msr]: an MSR bit, conceptually equivalent to `MSR.SF` and added for the same reasons, would suffice perfectly. +[^msr]: an MSR bit or bits, conceptually equivalent to `MSR.SF` and added for the same reasons, would suffice perfectly. [^extend]: Prefix opcode space (or MSR bits) **must** be reserved in advance to do so, in order to avoid the catastrophic binary-incompatibility mistake made by RISC-V RVV and ARM SVE/2 [^likeext001]: SVP64-Single is remarkably similar to the "bit 1" of EXT001 being set to indicate that the 64-bits is to be allocated in full to a new encoding, but in fact SVP64-single still embeds v3.0 Scalar operations. [^pseudorewrite]: elwidth overrides does however mean that all SFS / SFFS pseudocode will need rewriting to be in terms of XLEN. This has the indirect side-effect of automatically making a 32-bit Scalar Power ISA Specification possible, as well as a future 128-bit one (Cross-reference: RISC-V RV32 and RV128 -- 2.30.2