From 50812a20f1f92782f6d8f4976ce39753e7c0864d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Hansson Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:48:23 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] mem: Ensure InvalidateReq is considered isForward by MSHRs This patch fixes an issue where an MSHR would incorrectly be perceived to provide data to targets arriving after an InvalidateReq. To address this the InvalidateReq is now treated as isForward, much like an UpgradeReq that did not hit in the cache. Change-Id: Ia878444d949539b5c33fd19f3e12b0b8a872275e Reviewed-by: Andreas Hansson Reviewed-by: Stephan Diestelhorst --- src/mem/cache/cache.cc | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mem/cache/cache.cc b/src/mem/cache/cache.cc index a3211b0b4..6f02edb82 100644 --- a/src/mem/cache/cache.cc +++ b/src/mem/cache/cache.cc @@ -909,7 +909,8 @@ Cache::createMissPacket(PacketPtr cpu_pkt, CacheBlk *blk, bool blkValid = blk && blk->isValid(); if (cpu_pkt->req->isUncacheable() || - (!blkValid && cpu_pkt->isUpgrade())) { + (!blkValid && cpu_pkt->isUpgrade()) || + cpu_pkt->cmd == MemCmd::InvalidateReq) { // uncacheable requests and upgrades from upper-level caches // that missed completely just go through as is return nullptr; @@ -936,8 +937,7 @@ Cache::createMissPacket(PacketPtr cpu_pkt, CacheBlk *blk, // where the determination the StoreCond fails is delayed due to // all caches not being on the same local bus. cmd = MemCmd::SCUpgradeFailReq; - } else if (cpu_pkt->cmd == MemCmd::WriteLineReq || - cpu_pkt->cmd == MemCmd::InvalidateReq) { + } else if (cpu_pkt->cmd == MemCmd::WriteLineReq) { // forward as invalidate to all other caches, this gives us // the line in Exclusive state, and invalidates all other // copies -- 2.30.2