From 5275c9d740589abd631571cf48ac57d393d28093 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Hansson Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 04:06:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] mem: Use emplace front/back for deferred packets Embrace C++11 for the deferred packets as we actually store the objects in the data structure, and not just pointers. --- src/mem/bridge.cc | 4 ++-- src/mem/cache/prefetch/queued.cc | 2 +- src/mem/packet_queue.cc | 8 ++++---- src/mem/simple_mem.cc | 2 +- 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mem/bridge.cc b/src/mem/bridge.cc index 5b925d1cb..6bc8c18f2 100644 --- a/src/mem/bridge.cc +++ b/src/mem/bridge.cc @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ Bridge::BridgeMasterPort::schedTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt, Tick when) assert(transmitList.size() != reqQueueLimit); - transmitList.push_back(DeferredPacket(pkt, when)); + transmitList.emplace_back(DeferredPacket(pkt, when)); } @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ Bridge::BridgeSlavePort::schedTimingResp(PacketPtr pkt, Tick when) bridge.schedule(sendEvent, when); } - transmitList.push_back(DeferredPacket(pkt, when)); + transmitList.emplace_back(DeferredPacket(pkt, when)); } void diff --git a/src/mem/cache/prefetch/queued.cc b/src/mem/cache/prefetch/queued.cc index 318d565dc..97ea4eee6 100644 --- a/src/mem/cache/prefetch/queued.cc +++ b/src/mem/cache/prefetch/queued.cc @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ QueuedPrefetcher::notify(const PacketPtr &pkt) DPRINTF(HWPrefetch, "Prefetch queued. " "addr:%#x tick:%lld.\n", pf_addr, pf_time); - pfq.push_back(DeferredPacket(pf_time, pf_pkt)); + pfq.emplace_back(DeferredPacket(pf_time, pf_pkt)); } } diff --git a/src/mem/packet_queue.cc b/src/mem/packet_queue.cc index 1b2c69930..86cf599ab 100644 --- a/src/mem/packet_queue.cc +++ b/src/mem/packet_queue.cc @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ PacketQueue::schedSendTiming(PacketPtr pkt, Tick when, bool force_order) // note that currently we ignore a potentially outstanding retry // and could in theory put a new packet at the head of the // transmit list before retrying the existing packet - transmitList.push_front(DeferredPacket(when, pkt)); + transmitList.emplace_front(DeferredPacket(when, pkt)); schedSendEvent(when); return; } @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ PacketQueue::schedSendTiming(PacketPtr pkt, Tick when, bool force_order) // list is non-empty and this belongs at the end if (when >= transmitList.back().tick) { - transmitList.push_back(DeferredPacket(when, pkt)); + transmitList.emplace_back(DeferredPacket(when, pkt)); return; } @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ PacketQueue::schedSendTiming(PacketPtr pkt, Tick when, bool force_order) ++i; // already checked for insertion at front while (i != transmitList.end() && when >= i->tick) ++i; - transmitList.insert(i, DeferredPacket(when, pkt)); + transmitList.emplace(i, DeferredPacket(when, pkt)); } void @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ PacketQueue::sendDeferredPacket() schedSendEvent(deferredPacketReadyTime()); } else { // put the packet back at the front of the list - transmitList.push_front(dp); + transmitList.emplace_front(dp); } } diff --git a/src/mem/simple_mem.cc b/src/mem/simple_mem.cc index 52fd753c8..180339459 100644 --- a/src/mem/simple_mem.cc +++ b/src/mem/simple_mem.cc @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ SimpleMemory::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt) // to keep things simple (and in order), we put the packet at // the end even if the latency suggests it should be sent // before the packet(s) before it - packetQueue.push_back(DeferredPacket(pkt, curTick() + getLatency())); + packetQueue.emplace_back(DeferredPacket(pkt, curTick() + getLatency())); if (!retryResp && !dequeueEvent.scheduled()) schedule(dequeueEvent, packetQueue.back().tick); } else { -- 2.30.2