From 56d9532316ca9ab20f0b23f63f68dc8a3decf07f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:39:22 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] intel/mi_builder: Re-order an initializer

The order doesn't matter in C99 but some C++ compilers seem to care.

Tested-by: Clayton Craft <clayton.a.craft@intel.com>
---
 src/intel/common/gen_mi_builder.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/intel/common/gen_mi_builder.h b/src/intel/common/gen_mi_builder.h
index a67126930d6..bb817ce930e 100644
--- a/src/intel/common/gen_mi_builder.h
+++ b/src/intel/common/gen_mi_builder.h
@@ -519,9 +519,9 @@ static inline uint32_t
 _gen_mi_pack_alu(uint32_t opcode, uint32_t operand1, uint32_t operand2)
 {
    struct GENX(MI_MATH_ALU_INSTRUCTION) instr = {
-      .ALUOpcode = opcode,
-      .Operand1 = operand1,
       .Operand2 = operand2,
+      .Operand1 = operand1,
+      .ALUOpcode = opcode,
    };
 
    uint32_t dw;
-- 
2.30.2