From 59767d3c391672c0437867ac61baa83975ef53d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:42:52 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gdb.base/foll-fork.exp: remove DUPLICATEs

Remove DUPLICATEs, and and at the same time replace two uses of
gdb_test_multiple with gdb_test.  I don't think using gdb_test_multiple
is necessary here.

Change-Id: I8dcf097c3364e92d4f0e11f0c0f05dbb88e86742
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-fork.exp | 20 ++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-fork.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-fork.exp
index a3fa5bf4cd4..f777f2bda35 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-fork.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-fork.exp
@@ -194,13 +194,9 @@ proc catch_fork_child_follow {} {
 
     # Verify that the catchpoint is mentioned in an "info breakpoints",
     # and further that the catchpoint mentions no process id.
-    #
-    set test_name "info shows catchpoint without pid"
-    gdb_test_multiple "info breakpoints" "$test_name" {
-	-re ".*catchpoint.*keep y.*fork\[\r\n\]+$gdb_prompt $" {
-	    pass "$test_name"
-	}
-    }
+    gdb_test "info breakpoints" \
+	".*catchpoint.*keep y.*fork\[\r\n\]+" \
+	"info breakpoints before fork"
 
     gdb_test "continue" \
 	"Catchpoint \[0-9\]* \\(forked process \[0-9\]*\\),.*" \
@@ -208,13 +204,9 @@ proc catch_fork_child_follow {} {
 
     # Verify that the catchpoint is mentioned in an "info breakpoints",
     # and further that the catchpoint managed to capture a process id.
-    #
-    set test_name "info shows catchpoint without pid"
-    gdb_test_multiple "info breakpoints" "$test_name" {
-	-re ".*catchpoint.*keep y.*fork, process.*$gdb_prompt $" {
-	    pass "$test_name"
-	}
-    }
+    gdb_test "info breakpoints" \
+	".*catchpoint.*keep y.*fork, process.*" \
+	"info breakpoints after fork"
 
     gdb_test_no_output "set follow-fork child"
 
-- 
2.30.2