From 6647c1e86f3b311d906a19b85182eed010ec03cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 02:03:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment): Use DR_TARGET_ALIGNMENT on dr_info rather than dr. * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment): Use DR_TARGET_ALIGNMENT on dr_info rather than dr. Spelling fixes. From-SVN: r267318 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 2c12ca2ae26..6fe19d3b1b0 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2018-12-21 Jakub Jelinek + + * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment): Use + DR_TARGET_ALIGNMENT on dr_info rather than dr. Spelling fixes. + 2018-12-20 Joern Rennecke * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment): Don't do diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c index 6cd2c30ef4b..2cf31ae5420 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c @@ -2163,12 +2163,12 @@ vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo) /* Forcing alignment in the first iteration is no good if we don't keep it across iterations. For now, just disable versioning in this case. - ?? We could actually unroll the loop to archive the required - overall step alignemnt, and forcing the alignment could be + ?? We could actually unroll the loop to achieve the required + overall step alignment, and forcing the alignment could be done by doing some iterations of the non-vectorized loop. */ if (!multiple_p (LOOP_VINFO_VECT_FACTOR (loop_vinfo) * DR_STEP_ALIGNMENT (dr), - DR_TARGET_ALIGNMENT (dr))) + DR_TARGET_ALIGNMENT (dr_info))) { do_versioning = false; break; -- 2.30.2