From 6c15a70b75b1625b69790f98f2f44e9ae4435f6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Krol Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 16:12:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tgsi: Enable fast high precision rsqrt. --- src/gallium/auxiliary/tgsi/exec/tgsi_sse2.c | 22 --------------------- 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/tgsi/exec/tgsi_sse2.c b/src/gallium/auxiliary/tgsi/exec/tgsi_sse2.c index dbf002130bb..b6b05944be7 100755 --- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/tgsi/exec/tgsi_sse2.c +++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/tgsi/exec/tgsi_sse2.c @@ -761,20 +761,6 @@ emit_rcp ( make_xmm( xmm_src ) ); } -#if HIGH_PRECISION -static void XSTDCALL -rsqrt4f( - float *store ) -{ - const unsigned X = 0; - - store[X + 0] = 1.0F / sqrtf( store[X + 0] ); - store[X + 1] = 1.0F / sqrtf( store[X + 1] ); - store[X + 2] = 1.0F / sqrtf( store[X + 2] ); - store[X + 3] = 1.0F / sqrtf( store[X + 3] ); -} -#endif - static void emit_rsqrt( struct x86_function *func, @@ -782,13 +768,6 @@ emit_rsqrt( unsigned xmm_src ) { #if HIGH_PRECISION -#if 1 - emit_func_call_dst_src( - func, - xmm_dst, - xmm_src, - rsqrt4f ); -#else /* Although rsqrtps() and rcpps() are low precision on some/all SSE * implementations, it is possible to improve its precision at * fairly low cost, using a newton/raphson step, as below: @@ -817,7 +796,6 @@ emit_rsqrt( sse_subps( func, tmp0, src ); sse_mulps( func, dst, tmp0 ); } -#endif #else /* On Intel CPUs at least, this is only accurate to 12 bits -- not * good enough. -- 2.30.2