From 7174942f4ab895d1ad44a69c9a45cb64e7aa1464 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerald Pfeifer Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 10:07:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] gpl_v3.texi (Copying): Adjust the link to "Why not LGPL". * doc/include/gpl_v3.texi (Copying): Adjust the link to "Why not LGPL". From-SVN: r274600 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gcc/doc/include/gpl_v3.texi | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index e14ab3d7c91..d1eee8389fa 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2019-08-17 Gerald Pfeifer + + * doc/include/gpl_v3.texi (Copying): Adjust the link to "Why + not LGPL". + 2019-08-16 Eric Botcazou * tree-sra.c (build_reconstructed_reference): Return NULL_TREE instead diff --git a/gcc/doc/include/gpl_v3.texi b/gcc/doc/include/gpl_v3.texi index 05ed7557ef1..86d81904ec2 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/include/gpl_v3.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/include/gpl_v3.texi @@ -729,5 +729,5 @@ program into proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the library. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Lesser General Public License instead of this License. But -first, please read @url{https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html}. +first, please read @url{https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html}. @c man end -- 2.30.2