From 77688cec1c9bbce264bf091b73bbf7022ccb1fda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 08:23:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] start filling in --- isa_conflict_resolution.mdwn | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/isa_conflict_resolution.mdwn b/isa_conflict_resolution.mdwn index 85da256d0..e3a55be3e 100644 --- a/isa_conflict_resolution.mdwn +++ b/isa_conflict_resolution.mdwn @@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ the RISC-V Specification or not) without a bitter fight. It was also pointed out that there will be significant software tool maintenance costs for manufacturers, meaning that the probability will be extremely high that they will refuse to shoulder such costs, and -publish hopelessly out-of-date unpatched tools. This practice is -well-known to result in security flaws going unpatched, with one -of many immediate consequences being that product gets discarded into -landfill. +will publish and continue to publish (and use) hopelessly out-of-date +unpatched tools. This practice is well-known to result in security +flaws going unpatched, with one of many immediate undesirable consequences +being that product in extremely large volume gets discarded into landfill. All and any of the issues that were discussed, and all of those that were not, can be avoided by providing a forwards and backwards -- 2.30.2