From 7a5a05349e7ea7749d253dc1f201f7aea5497b79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Brobecker Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:05:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * solib-osf.c (open_map): Compute the list of shared libraries loaded by the inferior, rather than the list of libraries loaded by GDB itself. Otherwise, GDB ends up reading the symbols from the wrong shared libraries... --- gdb/ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ gdb/solib-osf.c | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 07bfffd475a..cc07fd9ac7b 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2002-07-02 Joel Brobecker + + * solib-osf.c (open_map): Compute the list of shared libraries + loaded by the inferior, rather than the list of libraries loaded + by GDB itself. Otherwise, GDB ends up reading the symbols from + the wrong shared libraries... + 2002-07-02 Mark Kettenis * i386-linux-tdep.c (i386_linux_sigcontext_addr): Make static. diff --git a/gdb/solib-osf.c b/gdb/solib-osf.c index a00e488ee04..6f43a8f0e49 100644 --- a/gdb/solib-osf.c +++ b/gdb/solib-osf.c @@ -359,7 +359,14 @@ static int open_map (struct read_map_ctxt *ctxt) { #ifdef USE_LDR_ROUTINES - ctxt->proc = ldr_my_process (); + /* Note: As originally written, ldr_my_process() was used to obtain + the value for ctxt->proc. This is incorrect, however, since + ldr_my_process() retrieves the "unique identifier" associated + with the current process (i.e. GDB) and not the one being + debugged. Presumably, the pid of the process being debugged is + compatible with the "unique identifier" used by the ldr_ + routines, so we use that. */ + ctxt->proc = ptid_get_pid (inferior_ptid); if (ldr_xattach (ctxt->proc) != 0) return 0; ctxt->next = LDR_NULL_MODULE; -- 2.30.2