From 89a208daacc59defd384b506238dec900894fb22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:48:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * remote-utils.c (prepare_resume_reply): Always supply "thread:". --- gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog b/gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog index 5066aafdd92..3f94cbbe590 100644 --- a/gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2004-02-29 Daniel Jacobowitz + + * remote-utils.c (prepare_resume_reply): Always supply "thread:". + 2004-02-29 Daniel Jacobowitz * linux-low.c (linux_wait): Unblock async I/O. diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c b/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c index cd8c3c56cbd..26b267a3aaf 100644 --- a/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c @@ -630,7 +630,11 @@ prepare_resume_reply (char *buf, char status, unsigned char signo) thread_from_wait = ((struct inferior_list_entry *)current_inferior)->id; if (debug_threads) fprintf (stderr, "Writing resume reply for %d\n\n", thread_from_wait); - if (old_thread_from_wait != thread_from_wait) + /* This if (1) ought to be unnecessary. But remote_wait in GDB + will claim this event belongs to inferior_ptid if we do not + specify a thread, and there's no way for gdbserver to know + what inferior_ptid is. */ + if (1 || old_thread_from_wait != thread_from_wait) { general_thread = thread_from_wait; sprintf (buf, "thread:%x;", thread_from_wait); -- 2.30.2