From 8abe8194399b69c7109fd591ecc3b3b62228ac78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Kingdon Date: Wed, 26 May 1993 05:24:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] punctuation fixes --- gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo b/gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo index 2b08b5bc754..e626d630000 100644 --- a/gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo +++ b/gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ Descriptors,,Table D: Type Descriptors}, for a list of There is an AIX extension for type attributes. Following the @samp{=} is any number of type attributes. Each one starts with @samp{@@} and ends with @samp{;}. Debuggers, including AIX's dbx, skip any type -attributes they do not recognize. GDB 4.9 does not do this--it will +attributes they do not recognize. GDB 4.9 does not do this---it will ignore the entire symbol containing a type attribute. Hopefully this will be fixed in the next GDB release. Because of a conflict with C++ (@pxref{Cplusplus}), new attributes should not be defined which begin @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ number of the register where the variable data will be stored. The value is the register number. AIX defines a separate symbol descriptor @samp{d} for floating point -registers. This seems incredibly stupid--why not just just give +registers. This seems incredibly stupid---why not just just give floating point registers different register numbers? I have not verified whether the compiler actually uses @samp{d}. -- 2.30.2