From 8eaf53202ea60191162d5f1069cd08ebd9f38f6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Marchi Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:36:20 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix usage of inferior_ptid in two thread_alive implementations While inspecting some target code, I noticed that in these two implementations of thread_alive, inferior_ptid is referenced directly instead of using the ptid passed as parameters. I guess that it is wrong, although I can't really test it in both cases. gdb/ChangeLog: * bsd-uthread.c (bsd_uthread_thread_alive): Use ptid instead of inferior_ptid. * go32-nat.c (go32_thread_alive): Likewise. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ gdb/bsd-uthread.c | 2 +- gdb/go32-nat.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 6cc163b3dee..30cd5767d8a 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2017-02-23 Simon Marchi + + * bsd-uthread.c (bsd_uthread_thread_alive): Use ptid instead of + inferior_ptid. + * go32-nat.c (go32_thread_alive): Likewise. + 2017-02-23 Yao Qi * varobj-iter.h (varobj_iter_delete): Call xfree instead of diff --git a/gdb/bsd-uthread.c b/gdb/bsd-uthread.c index 41c7d59be19..20eecd38799 100644 --- a/gdb/bsd-uthread.c +++ b/gdb/bsd-uthread.c @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ bsd_uthread_thread_alive (struct target_ops *ops, ptid_t ptid) { enum bfd_endian byte_order = gdbarch_byte_order (target_gdbarch ()); struct target_ops *beneath = find_target_beneath (ops); - CORE_ADDR addr = ptid_get_tid (inferior_ptid); + CORE_ADDR addr = ptid_get_tid (ptid); if (addr != 0) { diff --git a/gdb/go32-nat.c b/gdb/go32-nat.c index 3e9e99f068c..1fca8e2e53f 100644 --- a/gdb/go32-nat.c +++ b/gdb/go32-nat.c @@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ go32_terminal_ours (struct target_ops *self) static int go32_thread_alive (struct target_ops *ops, ptid_t ptid) { - return !ptid_equal (inferior_ptid, null_ptid); + return !ptid_equal (ptid, null_ptid); } static char * -- 2.30.2