From 99fc6299dbceaf6d58be2fb516a346451968a704 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas De Schampheleire Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:03:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] oprofile 0.9.8: fix compilation on powerpc The oprofile build was broken on powerpc since version 0.9.8. This was detected in several autobuilds, like http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/6f6c02d18495907d50fcdfc6003ac20d493c55fe/ Thomas Petazzoni had some fixes pending in his own tree, and this patch is partially based on this work (credits to him). Here is an overview: - I took over (and fixed) the oprofile.mk changes, except for the powerpc- specific part. For powerpc, there is a new dependency to libpfm4. - I reimported those Yocto patches that were specific to the ppc build issues, but left out the other ones. Those can be added in separate commits. [Peter: simplify libpfm4 check] Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire Tested-by: Thomas Petazzoni Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard --- package/oprofile/Config.in | 1 + ...profile-003-oprofile-ppc32-build-fix.patch | 32 ++++ ...-004-fix-ppc64-specific-libpfm-usage.patch | 105 ++++++++++++ ...-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch | 154 ++++++++++++++++++ package/oprofile/oprofile.mk | 19 ++- 5 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 package/oprofile/oprofile-003-oprofile-ppc32-build-fix.patch create mode 100644 package/oprofile/oprofile-004-fix-ppc64-specific-libpfm-usage.patch create mode 100644 package/oprofile/oprofile-005-fix-up-configure-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch diff --git a/package/oprofile/Config.in b/package/oprofile/Config.in index 8c881d15ee..0fbc87c4f2 100644 --- a/package/oprofile/Config.in +++ b/package/oprofile/Config.in @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_OPROFILE bool "oprofile" select BR2_PACKAGE_POPT select BR2_PACKAGE_BINUTILS + select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBPFM4 if BR2_powerpc depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP depends on !BR2_aarch64 # binutils help diff --git a/package/oprofile/oprofile-003-oprofile-ppc32-build-fix.patch b/package/oprofile/oprofile-003-oprofile-ppc32-build-fix.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0f609df0e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/package/oprofile/oprofile-003-oprofile-ppc32-build-fix.patch @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +Upstream-Status: Backport + +From fa889ea74b6b931e241a8cd57e90edc23cd7ab03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: William Cohen +Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:09:55 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH] OProfile doesn't build for 32-bit ppc; the operf_utils.cpp + compile fails. Need to be able to build the 32-bit ppc + version of oprofile to provide the 32-bit ppc java support + libraries. The configure only handles the case of ppc64 + with perf support. + +Signed-off-by: William Cohen +--- + configure.ac | 2 +- + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac +index b739133..7449854 100644 +--- a/configure.ac ++++ b/configure.ac +@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(HAVE_PERF_EVENTS, $HAVE_PERF_EVENTS, [Kernel support for perf + if test "$HAVE_PERF_EVENTS" = "1"; then + PFM_LIB= + arch="`uname -m`" +- if test "$arch" = "ppc64"; then ++ if test "$arch" = "ppc64" || test "$arch" = "ppc"; then + AC_CHECK_HEADER(perfmon/pfmlib.h,,[AC_MSG_ERROR([pfmlib.h not found; usually provided in papi devel package])]) + AC_CHECK_LIB(pfm,pfm_get_event_name, HAVE_LIBPFM3='1'; HAVE_LIBPFM='1', [ + AC_CHECK_LIB(pfm,pfm_get_os_event_encoding, HAVE_LIBPFM3='0'; HAVE_LIBPFM='1', +-- +1.7.9.7 + diff --git a/package/oprofile/oprofile-004-fix-ppc64-specific-libpfm-usage.patch b/package/oprofile/oprofile-004-fix-ppc64-specific-libpfm-usage.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d8a43de082 --- /dev/null +++ b/package/oprofile/oprofile-004-fix-ppc64-specific-libpfm-usage.patch @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +From 8e36ad01ceb1257d05773b684dbe9358aecd3f71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Maynard Johnson +Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:41:27 -0600 +Subject: [PATCH] Fix PPC64-specific libpfm usage so it doesn't break ppc32 + architecture + +The configure check to determine whether we should use libpfm or not +is intended only for the ppc64 architecture, but was incorrectly +hitting on the ppc32 architecture, too. Not only that, but it was using +'uname' which is not a good idea in cross-compile situtations. + +Then, aside from that, we had several instances in the source code +of the following: + #if (defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__)) +which incorrectly included ppc32 architecutre also, when it was intended +for use as PPC64 architecture. + +This patch fixes both errors. + +Signed-off-by: Maynard Johnson header.misc == PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER) { + in_kernel = false; + } +-#if (defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__)) ++#if PPC64_ARCH + else if (event->header.misc == PERF_RECORD_MISC_HYPERVISOR) { + #define MAX_HYPERVISOR_ADDRESS 0xfffffffULL + if (data.ip > MAX_HYPERVISOR_ADDRESS) { +diff --git a/libperf_events/operf_utils.h b/libperf_events/operf_utils.h +--- a/libperf_events/operf_utils.h ++++ b/libperf_events/operf_utils.h +@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ extern bool throttled; + #define MMAP_WINDOW_SZ (32 * 1024 * 1024ULL) + #endif + ++/* A macro to be used for ppc64 architecture-specific code. The '__powerpc__' macro ++ * is defined for both ppc64 and ppc32 architectures, so we must further qualify by ++ * including the 'HAVE_LIBPFM' macro, since that macro will be defined only for ppc64. ++ */ ++#define PPC64_ARCH (HAVE_LIBPFM) && ((defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__))) ++ + extern unsigned int op_nr_counters; + + static inline size_t align_64bit(u64 x) +diff --git a/pe_profiling/operf.cpp b/pe_profiling/operf.cpp +--- a/pe_profiling/operf.cpp ++++ b/pe_profiling/operf.cpp +@@ -1197,9 +1197,9 @@ static void _process_events_list(void) + _get_event_code(&event); + events.push_back(event); + } +-#if (defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__)) ++#if PPC64_ARCH + { +- /* This section of code is for architectures such as ppc[64] for which ++ /* This section of code is soley for the ppc64 architecture for which + * the oprofile event code needs to be converted to the appropriate event + * code to pass to the perf_event_open syscall. + */ +@@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static void get_default_event(void) + _get_event_code(&dft_evt); + events.push_back(dft_evt); + +-#if (defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__)) ++#if PPC64_ARCH + { + /* This section of code is for architectures such as ppc[64] for which + * the oprofile event code needs to be converted to the appropriate event diff --git a/package/oprofile/oprofile-005-fix-up-configure-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch b/package/oprofile/oprofile-005-fix-up-configure-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..6d7a6ef64c --- /dev/null +++ b/package/oprofile/oprofile-005-fix-up-configure-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +Upstream-Status: Backport + +From ca6d916a6f8f0f8abbb4c9b6a97dd1a1615bb124 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Maynard Johnson +Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:16:35 -0600 +Subject: [PATCH] Fix up configure to handle architectures that do not + implement perf_event_open + +This patch fixes the following problems: + +1) The configure script allows the user to pass a location to kernel +headers (via --with-kernel option) such that, even if the running +kernel does not have perf_events support, it may be possible to +build operf (e.g., in cross-compile environments). But the message +'This kernel does not have perf_events support; falling back to legacy +oprofile' was being displayed inappropriately in such cases. This +patch changes the configure script so that the "falling back to +legacy oprofile" message will only be displayed if we're running +on a kernel that does not have perf_events support AND the user +did not pass specify the "--with-kernel" option. + +2) Some architectures don't even implement the perf_event_open syscall, so the +configure script must do more than checking kernel version and whether or not +perf_event.h is present in order to decide if perf_events is supported. +This patch provides that extra capability. + +These problems were reported by Tony Jones . + +Signed-off-by: Maynard Johnson +--- + configure.ac | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- + utils/op_perf_events_checker.c | 6 ++-- + 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac +--- a/configure.ac ++++ b/configure.ac +@@ -70,35 +70,70 @@ KERNELDIR=$withval) + + + dnl Check kernel version for perf_events supported +-AC_MSG_CHECKING([kernel version supports perf_events]) + if test "$KERNELDIR" != ""; then + KINC="$KERNELDIR/include" ++ PERF_EVENT_FLAGS=" -I$KERNELDIR/include" ++ AC_SUBST(PERF_EVENT_FLAGS) ++ PERF_EVENT_H="$KERNELDIR/include/linux/perf_event.h" ++else ++ PERF_EVENT_H="/usr/include/linux/perf_event.h" + fi +-AX_KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 31, <=, kernel_has_perf_events_support="yes", ++ ++PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS="no" ++kernel_may_have_perf_events_support="no" ++AX_KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 31, <=, kernel_may_have_perf_events_support="yes", + kernel_has_perf_events_support="no") + +-if test "$kernel_has_perf_events_support" = "no"; then +- AC_MSG_RESULT([This kernel does not have perf_events support; falling back to legacy oprofile]) ++dnl The AX_KERNEL_VERSION macro may return kernel_may_have_perf_events_support="yes", ++dnl indicating a partial answer. Some architectures do not implement the Performance ++dnl Events Kernel Subsystem even with kernel versions > 2.6.31 -- i.e., not even ++dnl implementing the perf_event_open syscall to return ENOSYS. So the check below ++dnl will identify and handle such situations. ++ ++if test "$kernel_may_have_perf_events_support" = "yes"; then ++ AC_CHECK_HEADER($PERF_EVENT_H,PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS="yes") ++ AC_MSG_CHECKING([kernel supports perf_events]) ++ if test "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS" = "yes"; then ++ rm -f test-for-PERF_EVENT_OPEN ++ AC_LANG_CONFTEST( ++ [AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[#include ++ #include ++ #include ++ #include ++ ]], ++ [[struct perf_event_attr attr; ++ pid_t pid; ++ memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr)); ++ attr.size = sizeof(attr); ++ attr.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_IP; ++ pid = getpid(); ++ syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, pid, 0, -1, 0); ++ ]]) ++ ]) ++ $CC conftest.$ac_ext $CFLAGS $LDFLAGS $LIBS $PERF_EVENT_FLAGS -o test-for-PERF_EVENT_OPEN > /dev/null 2>&1 ++ if test -f test-for-PERF_EVENT_OPEN; then ++ kernel_has_perf_events_support="yes" ++ AC_MSG_RESULT(yes) ++ else ++ AC_MSG_RESULT(no) ++ kernel_has_perf_events_support="no" ++ fi ++ else ++ AC_MSG_RESULT(unknown -- perf_event.h not found) ++ fi + else +- AC_MSG_RESULT([This kernel has perf_events support]) ++ AC_MSG_RESULT(kernel supports perf_events... no) ++ kernel_has_perf_events_support="no" ++fi ++AM_CONDITIONAL(BUILD_FOR_PERF_EVENT, test "$kernel_has_perf_events_support" = "yes") ++ ++if test "$kernel_has_perf_events_support" = "yes"; then ++ HAVE_PERF_EVENTS='1' ++else ++ HAVE_PERF_EVENTS='0' ++ AC_MSG_RESULT([No perf_events support available; falling back to legacy oprofile]) + fi + +-if test "$KERNELDIR" == ""; then +- PERF_EVENT_H="/usr/include/linux/perf_event.h" +-else +- PERF_EVENT_H="$KERNELDIR/include/linux/perf_event.h" +-fi +-AC_CHECK_HEADER($PERF_EVENT_H,PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS="yes") +-AM_CONDITIONAL(BUILD_FOR_PERF_EVENT, test -n "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS") +-if test "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS" = "yes"; then +- HAVE_PERF_EVENTS='1' +- if test "$KERNELDIR" != ""; then +- PERF_EVENT_FLAGS=" -I$KERNELDIR/include" +- AC_SUBST(PERF_EVENT_FLAGS) +- fi +-else +- HAVE_PERF_EVENTS='0' +-fi + AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(HAVE_PERF_EVENTS, $HAVE_PERF_EVENTS, [Kernel support for perf_events exists]) + AC_CANONICAL_HOST + if test "$HAVE_PERF_EVENTS" = "1"; then +@@ -414,7 +449,7 @@ elif test "`getent passwd oprofile 2>/de + fi + fi + +-if test "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS" != "yes" && test "$kernel_has_perf_events_support" = "yes"; then ++if test "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS" != "yes" && test "$kernel_may_have_perf_events_support" = "yes"; then + echo "Warning: perf_event.h not found. Please install the kernel headers package if you" + echo " want non-root support built into OProfile." + fi +diff --git a/utils/op_perf_events_checker.c b/utils/op_perf_events_checker.c +--- a/utils/op_perf_events_checker.c ++++ b/utils/op_perf_events_checker.c +@@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) + } + + #if HAVE_PERF_EVENTS +- /* If perf_events syscall is not implemented, the syscall below will fail +- * with ENOSYS (38). If implemented, but the processor type on which this ++ /* Even if the perf_event_open syscall is implemented, the architecture may still ++ * not provide a full implementation of the perf_events subsystem, in which case, ++ * the syscall below will fail with ENOSYS (38). If the perf_events subsystem is ++ * implemented for the architecture, but the processor type on which this + * program is running is not supported by perf_events, the syscall returns + * ENOENT (2). + */ diff --git a/package/oprofile/oprofile.mk b/package/oprofile/oprofile.mk index f3ea23f921..6c397020cd 100644 --- a/package/oprofile/oprofile.mk +++ b/package/oprofile/oprofile.mk @@ -8,7 +8,12 @@ OPROFILE_VERSION = 0.9.8 OPROFILE_SITE = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/oprofile/oprofile/oprofile-$(OPROFILE_VERSION) OPROFILE_LICENSE = GPLv2+ OPROFILE_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING -OPROFILE_CONF_OPT = --localstatedir=/var --with-kernel-support +OPROFILE_CONF_OPT = \ + --localstatedir=/var \ + --disable-account-check \ + --enable-gui=no \ + --with-kernel=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr +OPROFILE_AUTORECONF = YES OPROFILE_BINARIES = utils/ophelp pp/opannotate pp/oparchive pp/opgprof OPROFILE_BINARIES += pp/opreport opjitconv/opjitconv daemon/oprofiled OPROFILE_BINARIES += utils/op-check-perfevents pe_profiling/operf libabi/opimport @@ -29,7 +34,17 @@ ifeq ($(OPROFILE_ARCH),) OPROFILE_ARCH = $(BR2_ARCH) endif -OPROFILE_DEPENDENCIES = popt binutils +OPROFILE_DEPENDENCIES = popt binutils host-pkgconf + +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_LIBPFM4),y) +OPROFILE_DEPENDENCIES += libpfm4 +endif + +define OPROFILE_CREATE_FILES + touch $(@D)/NEWS $(@D)/AUTHORS $(@D)/ChangeLog +endef + +OPROFILE_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += OPROFILE_CREATE_FILES define OPROFILE_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin -- 2.30.2