From 9d6d78f25971d3f312043d5d06bf4244c20bb6b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Cagney Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:47:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update removing anything fixed. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 4 +++ gdb/TODO | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 024d621d32b..9ef0d076345 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +Mon Apr 3 18:20:03 2000 Andrew Cagney + + * TODO: Update. + Mon Apr 3 14:56:11 2000 Andrew Cagney * top.c: Re-indent. diff --git a/gdb/TODO b/gdb/TODO index 5fe9f5b4881..928c677e0e0 100644 --- a/gdb/TODO +++ b/gdb/TODO @@ -28,34 +28,6 @@ release of GDB. -- -Watch point related patches (Eli Zaretskii, Michael Snyder, ???) - -Eli writes: This doesn't include the watchpoint-related patches I sent -beginning with August or September, and mentioned them again three -weeks ago. Here again are the pointers to the relevant messages: - -Hardware breakpoints and watchpoints: patches -http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q3/msg00173.html - -Re: Hardware breakpoints and watchpoints: patches -http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q3/msg00204.html - -Re: Hardware breakpoints and watchpoints: patches -http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q4/msg00200.html - -Hardware watchpoints for bitfields -http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q4/msg00201.html - --- - -Tom's speedups to GDB (Tom Tromey, Jim Blandy) - -I believe that there was a late breaking fix that stopped a coredump. - -http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00869.html - --- - Solaris/x86 - which? (Nick Duffek, Peter Schauer, Michael Snyder?) Nick D's working through patches from Michael Snyder and Peter S. @@ -224,11 +196,36 @@ you're introducing discrepancies between the manual and the documentation, and everybody is confused - witness the lack of doc for the tracing commands still, some two years after they were added... -[PATCH] GDB command-line switches and annotations docs +Discussion on MI can be found on the thread: [PATCH] GDB command-line +switches and annotations docs http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00639.html -- +Revised UDP support (was: Re: [Fwd: [patch] UDP transport support]) +http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-04/msg00000.html + +-- + +problems loading shared libraries - with attached test case +http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00820.html + +Hi, I'm having problems loading shared libraries. This is with a +build of gdb out of cvs that I pulled and built on March 27th and has +been there for at least a week. I haven't gone back further than +that. This is with the gcc that is shipping with Red Hat 6.2: + +Reading specs from +/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version +egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) + +I'm using "set auto-solib-add 0" after main has been called. If I use +"shar" to load a shared library manually once I can't use it again to +load another shared library later. Please see the attached log for an +example of how to reproduce the problem. + +-- + GDB 5.0: Won't have ------------------- @@ -290,6 +287,19 @@ http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00811.html -- +Re: gdb-cvs fails on freebsd-elf +http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-04/msg00004.html + +FreeBSD haven't contributed their local GDB changes back to the master +sources (they would at least need an FSF assignment by all +individuales that contributed to the work). Given the strong +likelhood that this will never happen, I'd suggest that a better +strategy would be for someone (with an FSF/GDD assignment) to do a new +(clean-room) implementation. That can then be accepted in time for +GDB 5.1. + +-- + GDB 5.0: Test results --------------------- -- 2.30.2