From 9f5fee880470a7e317aad35d4521cd525714455f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kenneth Graunke Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 04:16:54 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] i965: Handle CMP.nz ... 0 and MOV.nz similarly in cmod propagation. "MOV.nz null src" and "CMP.nz null src 0" are equivalent instructions. Previously, we deleted MOV.nz instructions when the instruction generating the MOV's source also wrote the flag register (as the flag register already contains the desired value). However, we wouldn't delete CMP.nz instructions that served the same purpose. We also didn't attempt true cmod propagation on MOV.nz instructions, while we would for the equivalent CMP.nz form. This patch fixes both limitations, treating both forms equally. CMP.nz instructions will now be deleted (helping the NIR backend), and MOV.nz instructions will have their .nz propagated. No changes in shader-db without NIR. With NIR, total instructions in shared programs: 6006153 -> 5969364 (-0.61%) instructions in affected programs: 2087139 -> 2050350 (-1.76%) helped: 10704 HURT: 0 GAINED: 2 LOST: 2 Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke Reviewed-by: Matt Turner --- .../drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_cmod_propagation.cpp | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_cmod_propagation.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_cmod_propagation.cpp index ec9f812ea11..c6384ab53cf 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_cmod_propagation.cpp +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_cmod_propagation.cpp @@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ opt_cmod_propagation_local(fs_visitor *v, bblock_t *block) continue; if (inst->opcode == BRW_OPCODE_MOV && - (inst->conditional_mod != BRW_CONDITIONAL_NZ || - inst->src[0].negate)) + inst->conditional_mod != BRW_CONDITIONAL_NZ) continue; bool read_flag = false; @@ -81,15 +80,20 @@ opt_cmod_propagation_local(fs_visitor *v, bblock_t *block) scan_inst->dst.reg_offset != inst->src[0].reg_offset) break; - if (inst->opcode == BRW_OPCODE_MOV) { - if (!scan_inst->writes_flag()) - break; - + /* If the instruction generating inst's source also wrote the + * flag, and inst is doing a simple .nz comparison, then inst + * is redundant - the appropriate value is already in the flag + * register. Delete inst. + */ + if (inst->conditional_mod == BRW_CONDITIONAL_NZ && + !inst->src[0].negate && + scan_inst->writes_flag()) { inst->remove(block); progress = true; break; } + /* Otherwise, try propagating the conditional. */ enum brw_conditional_mod cond = inst->src[0].negate ? brw_swap_cmod(inst->conditional_mod) : inst->conditional_mod; -- 2.30.2