From a36a812c48d42b56dddd60ccbdecc47a84e38e5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Kingdon Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1994 03:23:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * TODO: Reword item regarding NO_STD_REGS. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 2 ++ gdb/TODO | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 5ba84cffb80..0bc137eeb2b 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ Tue Sep 20 11:34:27 1994 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com) + * TODO: Reword item regarding NO_STD_REGS. + * coffread.c (record_minimal_symbol, coff_read_enum_type, coff_read_struct_type): Allocate on symbol_obstack, not directly via malloc/savestring. diff --git a/gdb/TODO b/gdb/TODO index 576f0aacca1..0f8f8ec9d7e 100644 --- a/gdb/TODO +++ b/gdb/TODO @@ -380,9 +380,9 @@ enum mask If try to modify value in file with "set write off" should give appropriate error not "cannot access memory at address 0x65e0". -What the hell is no_std_regs in tm-z8k.h??? -This fixes the case where a target defines no standard reg names, -and the parsing of $pc gets confused when it should be an invalid expr. +Why do we allow a target to omit standard register names (NO_STD_REGS +in tm-z8k.h)? I thought the standard register names were supposed to +be just that, standard. Make DEBUG_EXPRESSIONS a maintenance command, dependent on MAINTENANCE_COMMANDS. -- 2.30.2