From a7067863418451b27130bb4300ac1890ff806c12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Burgess Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 19:49:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gdb: Check for not allocated/associated values during array slicing When extracting an array slice we should give up if the array is not-allocated or not-associated. For Fortran, at least in gfortran compiled code, the upper and lower bounds are undefined if the array is not allocated or not associated, in which case performing checks against these bounds will result in undefined behaviour. Better then to throw an error if we try to slice such an array. This changes the error message that the user will receive in these cases (if they got an error message before). Previously they may have gotten "slice out of range" now they'll get "array not allocated" or "array not associated". gdb/ChangeLog: * valops.c (value_slice): Check for not allocated or not associated values. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.fortran/vla-sizeof.exp: Update expected results. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-sizeof.exp | 4 ++-- gdb/valops.c | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 6f6e6baee60..022ce04d000 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2019-06-10 Andrew Burgess + + * valops.c (value_slice): Check for not allocated or not + associated values. + 2019-06-10 Tom de Vries PR gdb/24618 diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog index 7cc712ba560..33ae2f4925f 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2019-06-10 Andrew Burgess + + * gdb.fortran/vla-sizeof.exp: Update expected results. + 2019-06-06 Amos Bird * gdb.base/annota1.exp (thread_switch): Add test for diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-sizeof.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-sizeof.exp index b6fdaebbf51..4fe6938445c 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-sizeof.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-sizeof.exp @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ gdb_test "print sizeof(vla1)" " = 0" "print sizeof non-allocated vla1" gdb_test "print sizeof(vla1(3,2,1))" \ "no such vector element \\(vector not allocated\\)" \ "print sizeof non-allocated indexed vla1" -gdb_test "print sizeof(vla1(3:4,2,1))" "slice out of range" \ +gdb_test "print sizeof(vla1(3:4,2,1))" "array not allocated" \ "print sizeof non-allocated sliced vla1" # Try to access value in allocated VLA @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ gdb_test "print sizeof(pvla)" " = 0" "print sizeof non-associated pvla" gdb_test "print sizeof(pvla(3,2,1))" \ "no such vector element \\(vector not associated\\)" \ "print sizeof non-associated indexed pvla" -gdb_test "print sizeof(pvla(3:4,2,1))" "slice out of range" \ +gdb_test "print sizeof(pvla(3:4,2,1))" "array not associated" \ "print sizeof non-associated sliced pvla" # Try to access values in pointer to VLA and compare them diff --git a/gdb/valops.c b/gdb/valops.c index fd92a4d1655..cbf2eccde3e 100644 --- a/gdb/valops.c +++ b/gdb/valops.c @@ -3801,6 +3801,11 @@ value_slice (struct value *array, int lowbound, int length) && TYPE_CODE (array_type) != TYPE_CODE_STRING) error (_("cannot take slice of non-array")); + if (type_not_allocated (array_type)) + error (_("array not allocated")); + if (type_not_associated (array_type)) + error (_("array not associated")); + range_type = TYPE_INDEX_TYPE (array_type); if (get_discrete_bounds (range_type, &lowerbound, &upperbound) < 0) error (_("slice from bad array or bitstring")); -- 2.30.2