From aa5b595f39b778d0f6532b40761ca5d6275c2aa0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Reinhardt Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 01:20:58 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Oops... some places in C++ explicitly ask for a "functional" port. It would be better to move this to python IMO but for now I'll stick in a compatibility hack. --HG-- extra : convert_revision : a81a29cbd43becd0e485559eb7b2a31f7a0b082d --- src/mem/physical.cc | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/mem/physical.cc b/src/mem/physical.cc index 2ca3f1c83..a49959e51 100644 --- a/src/mem/physical.cc +++ b/src/mem/physical.cc @@ -336,6 +336,13 @@ PhysicalMemory::doFunctionalAccess(PacketPtr pkt) Port * PhysicalMemory::getPort(const std::string &if_name, int idx) { + // Accept request for "functional" port for backwards compatibility + // with places where this function is called from C++. I'd prefer + // to move all these into Python someday. + if (if_name == "functional") { + return new MemoryPort(csprintf("%s-functional", name()), this); + } + if (if_name != "port") { panic("PhysicalMemory::getPort: unknown port %s requested", if_name); } -- 2.30.2