From aaa67502729b8696e5f4953967a3f143d27d367c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joseph Myers Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 11:02:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] extend.texi: Update WG14 URL. * doc/extend.texi: Update WG14 URL. testsuite: * gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c: Update WG14 URL. From-SVN: r81876 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gcc/doc/extend.texi | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index b16217904c4..808ed608ae9 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2004-05-15 Joseph S. Myers + + * doc/extend.texi: Update WG14 URL. + 2004-05-15 Steven Bosscher * basic-block.h (life_analysis, delete_noop_moves): diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi index dbab25c6dfc..22f5f29efd1 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi @@ -5489,7 +5489,7 @@ Similar to @code{__builtin_nan}, except the return type is @code{long double}. @deftypefn {Built-in Function} double __builtin_nans (const char *str) Similar to @code{__builtin_nan}, except the significand is forced to be a signaling NaN. The @code{nans} function is proposed by -@uref{http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n965.htm,,WG14 N965}. +@uref{http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n965.htm,,WG14 N965}. @end deftypefn @deftypefn {Built-in Function} float __builtin_nansf (const char *str) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index d192d2ff1e1..1a61456a913 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2004-05-15 Joseph S. Myers + + * gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c: Update WG14 URL. + 2004-05-15 Joseph S. Myers PR c/15444 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c index 4e31eee4563..e94a2c8e6da 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* It is not clear whether this test is conforming. See DR#236 - http://wwwold.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/dr_236.htm. However, + http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_236.htm. However, there seems to be consensus that the presence of a union to aggregate struct s1 and struct s2 should make it conforming. */ struct s1 { double d; }; -- 2.30.2