From ac76aeef20abff6ead3e362b30dc07d809678e53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Marek=20Ol=C5=A1=C3=A1k?= Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:38:10 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] radeonsi: switch back to standard DX sample positions Apps may rely on them. --- src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_msaa.c | 43 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_msaa.c b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_msaa.c index 10232a5e18b..f9387e75ed1 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_msaa.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_msaa.c @@ -87,26 +87,31 @@ static const uint32_t sample_locs_1x = FILL_SREG( 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); /* S1, S2, S3 fields are not used by 1x */ static const uint64_t centroid_priority_1x = 0x0000000000000000ull; -/* 2x MSAA */ +/* 2x MSAA (the positions are sorted for EQAA) */ static const uint32_t sample_locs_2x = FILL_SREG(-4,-4, 4, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0); /* S2 & S3 fields are not used by 2x MSAA */ static const uint64_t centroid_priority_2x = 0x1010101010101010ull; -/* 4x, 8x, and 16x MSAA - * - The first 4 locations happen to be optimal for 4x MSAA, better than - * the standard DX 4x locations. - * - The first 8 locations happen to be almost as good as 8x DX locations, - * but the DX locations are horrible for worst-case EQAA 8s4f and 8s2f. - */ -static const uint32_t sample_locs_4x_8x_16x[] = { +/* 4x MSAA (the positions are sorted for EQAA) */ +static const uint32_t sample_locs_4x = + FILL_SREG(-2,-6, 2, 6, -6, 2, 6,-2); +static const uint64_t centroid_priority_4x = 0x3210321032103210ull; + +/* 8x MSAA (the positions are sorted for EQAA) */ +static const uint32_t sample_locs_8x[] = { + FILL_SREG(-3,-5, 5, 1, -1, 3, 7,-7), + FILL_SREG(-7,-1, 3, 7, -5, 5, 1,-3), +}; +static const uint64_t centroid_priority_8x = 0x3546012735460127ull; + +/* 16x MSAA (the positions are sorted for EQAA) */ +static const uint32_t sample_locs_16x[] = { FILL_SREG(-5,-2, 5, 3, -2, 6, 3,-5), - FILL_SREG(-6,-7, 1, 1, -6, 4, 7,-3), + FILL_SREG(-4,-6, 1, 1, -6, 4, 7,-4), FILL_SREG(-1,-3, 6, 7, -3, 2, 0,-7), - FILL_SREG(-4,-6, 2, 5, -8, 0, 4,-1), + FILL_SREG(-7,-8, 2, 5, -8, 0, 4,-1), }; -static const uint64_t centroid_priority_4x = 0x2310231023102310ull; -static const uint64_t centroid_priority_8x = 0x4762310547623105ull; -static const uint64_t centroid_priority_16x = 0x49e7c6b231d0fa85ull; +static const uint64_t centroid_priority_16x = 0xc97e64b231d0fa85ull; static void si_get_sample_position(struct pipe_context *ctx, unsigned sample_count, unsigned sample_index, float *out_value) @@ -122,9 +127,13 @@ static void si_get_sample_position(struct pipe_context *ctx, unsigned sample_cou sample_locs = &sample_locs_2x; break; case 4: + sample_locs = &sample_locs_4x; + break; case 8: + sample_locs = sample_locs_8x; + break; case 16: - sample_locs = sample_locs_4x_8x_16x; + sample_locs = sample_locs_16x; break; } @@ -172,13 +181,13 @@ void si_emit_sample_locations(struct radeon_cmdbuf *cs, int nr_samples) si_emit_max_4_sample_locs(cs, centroid_priority_2x, sample_locs_2x); break; case 4: - si_emit_max_4_sample_locs(cs, centroid_priority_4x, sample_locs_4x_8x_16x[0]); + si_emit_max_4_sample_locs(cs, centroid_priority_4x, sample_locs_4x); break; case 8: - si_emit_max_16_sample_locs(cs, centroid_priority_8x, sample_locs_4x_8x_16x, 8); + si_emit_max_16_sample_locs(cs, centroid_priority_8x, sample_locs_8x, 8); break; case 16: - si_emit_max_16_sample_locs(cs, centroid_priority_16x, sample_locs_4x_8x_16x, 16); + si_emit_max_16_sample_locs(cs, centroid_priority_16x, sample_locs_16x, 16); break; } } -- 2.30.2