From acbe30bbc884899da72df47d023ebde89f8f47f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marek Polacek Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 16:04:26 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix ICE in reshape_init with init-list [PR95164] This patch fixes a long-standing bug in reshape_init_r. Since r209314 we implement DR 1467 which handles list-initialization with a single initializer of the same type as the target. In this test this causes a crash in reshape_init_r when we're processing a constructor that has undergone the DR 1467 transformation. Take e.g. the foo({{1, {H{k}}}}); line in the attached test. {H{k}} initializes the field b of H in I. H{k} is a functional cast, so has TREE_HAS_CONSTRUCTOR set, so is COMPOUND_LITERAL_P. We perform the DR 1467 transformation and turn {H{k}} into H{k}. Then we attempt to reshape H{k} again and since first_initializer_p is null and it's COMPOUND_LITERAL_P, we go here: else if (COMPOUND_LITERAL_P (stripped_init)) gcc_assert (!BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (stripped_init)); then complain about the missing braces, go to reshape_init_class and ICE on gcc_checking_assert (d->cur->index == get_class_binding (type, id)); because due to the missing { } we're looking for 'b' in H, but that's not found. So we have to be prepared to handle an initializer whose outer braces have been removed due to DR 1467. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/95164 * decl.c (reshape_init_r): When initializing an aggregate member with an initializer from an initializer-list, also consider COMPOUND_LITERAL_P. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/95164 * g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist123.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/decl.c | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist123.C | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist123.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c index 31d68745844..ca1c8a4a0e6 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/decl.c +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c @@ -6466,7 +6466,7 @@ reshape_init_r (tree type, reshape_iter *d, tree first_initializer_p, non-empty subaggregate, brace elision is assumed and the initializer is considered for the initialization of the first member of the subaggregate. */ - if (TREE_CODE (init) != CONSTRUCTOR + if ((TREE_CODE (init) != CONSTRUCTOR || COMPOUND_LITERAL_P (init)) /* But don't try this for the first initializer, since that would be looking through the outermost braces; A a2 = { a1 }; is not a valid aggregate initialization. */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist123.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist123.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..29f037f07ef --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist123.C @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +// PR c++/95164 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } +// { dg-options "-Wmissing-braces" } + +struct H { + int a; +}; + +struct X : H { }; + +struct I { + int c; + H b; +}; +struct E { I d; }; +void foo(E); + +template +void fn () +{ + int a = 42; + int &k = a; + + foo({1, {H{k}}}); // { dg-warning "missing braces around initializer for .I." } + foo({1, {X{k}}}); // { dg-warning "missing braces around initializer for .I." } + + foo({{1, {k}}}); + foo({{1, {N}}}); + + foo({{1, H{k}}}); + foo({{1, H{N}}}); + foo({{1, X{k}}}); + foo({{1, X{N}}}); + + foo({{1, {H{k}}}}); + foo({{1, {H{N}}}}); + foo({{1, {X{k}}}}); + foo({{1, {X{N}}}}); +} -- 2.30.2