From b6f01001b162dfcb6919f37908ab7dd01edc831f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Stallman Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1993 18:46:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] (expand_expr, case ADDR_EXPR): Treat CONCAT like REG. From-SVN: r5030 --- gcc/expr.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c index 6a4a258c859..85f78a7dfc6 100644 --- a/gcc/expr.c +++ b/gcc/expr.c @@ -5369,7 +5369,11 @@ expand_expr (exp, target, tmode, modifier) op0 = force_const_mem (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0))), op0); - if (GET_CODE (op0) == REG || GET_CODE (op0) == SUBREG) + /* These cases happen in Fortran. Is that legitimate? + Should Fortran work in another way? + Do they happen in C? */ + if (GET_CODE (op0) == REG || GET_CODE (op0) == SUBREG + || GET_CODE (op0) == CONCAT) { /* If this object is in a register, it must be not be BLKmode. */ -- 2.30.2