From b8197a01a96f5d15268ee5bab28637058f2f962a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Ekstrand Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:27:39 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] nir/constant_folding: Get rid of a bit size switch statement Now that nir_const_value is a scalar, we don't need the switch on bit size in order to swizzle them properly. Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst --- src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_constant_folding.c | 20 +------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_constant_folding.c b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_constant_folding.c index 60cec7ffda6..84dbce5ac30 100644 --- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_constant_folding.c +++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_constant_folding.c @@ -75,25 +75,7 @@ constant_fold_alu_instr(nir_alu_instr *instr, void *mem_ctx) for (unsigned j = 0; j < nir_ssa_alu_instr_src_components(instr, i); j++) { - switch(load_const->def.bit_size) { - case 64: - src[i][j].u64 = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]].u64; - break; - case 32: - src[i][j].u32 = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]].u32; - break; - case 16: - src[i][j].u16 = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]].u16; - break; - case 8: - src[i][j].u8 = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]].u8; - break; - case 1: - src[i][j].b = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]].b; - break; - default: - unreachable("Invalid bit size"); - } + src[i][j] = load_const->value[instr->src[i].swizzle[j]]; } /* We shouldn't have any source modifiers in the optimization loop. */ -- 2.30.2