From bfc1906fb07f235cb909a8d7860491e521c56c77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Buettner Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:13:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * mn10300-tdep.c (mn10300_analyze_prologue): Delete code disabled via "#if 0". --- gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gdb/mn10300-tdep.c | 30 ------------------------------ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index a777feaceca..7e23cf11b0d 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2005-09-06 Kevin Buettner + + * mn10300-tdep.c (mn10300_analyze_prologue): Delete code disabled + via "#if 0". + 2005-09-06 Kevin Buettner * mn10300-tdep.c (mn10300_analyze_prologue): Use diff --git a/gdb/mn10300-tdep.c b/gdb/mn10300-tdep.c index cabd857dd84..24e7b6a026a 100644 --- a/gdb/mn10300-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/mn10300-tdep.c @@ -551,36 +551,6 @@ mn10300_analyze_prologue (struct frame_info *fi, return pc; } -#if 0 - /* Get the next two bytes into buf, we need two because rets is a two - byte insn and the first isn't enough to uniquely identify it. */ - if (!safe_frame_unwind_memory (fi, pc, buf, 2)) - return pc; - - /* Note: kevinb/2003-07-16: We shouldn't be making these sorts of - changes to the frame in prologue examination code. */ - /* If we're physically on an "rets" instruction, then our frame has - already been deallocated. Note this can also be true for retf - and ret if they specify a size of zero. - - In this case fi->frame is bogus, we need to fix it. */ - if (fi && buf[0] == 0xf0 && buf[1] == 0xfc) - { - if (get_next_frame (fi) == NULL) - deprecated_update_frame_base_hack (fi, read_sp ()); - return get_frame_pc (fi); - } - - /* Similarly if we're stopped on the first insn of a prologue as our - frame hasn't been allocated yet. */ - if (fi && get_frame_pc (fi) == func_addr) - { - if (get_next_frame (fi) == NULL) - deprecated_update_frame_base_hack (fi, read_sp ()); - return get_frame_pc (fi); - } -#endif - /* NOTE: from here on, we don't want to return without jumping to finish_prologue. */ -- 2.30.2