From c4f8f209e79ee0b2d9e10f82e73f26f65bab17eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Kingdon Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1993 21:19:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * config/sparc/tm-sparc.h: Add comment suggesting that removing ins and locals from the registers array might clean things up. --- gdb/config/sparc/tm-sparc.h | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/config/sparc/tm-sparc.h b/gdb/config/sparc/tm-sparc.h index 07c8cde3efe..b6c376d919f 100644 --- a/gdb/config/sparc/tm-sparc.h +++ b/gdb/config/sparc/tm-sparc.h @@ -162,7 +162,15 @@ extern CORE_ADDR sparc_pc_adjust(); #define CPS_REGNUM 71 /* Coprocessor status register */ /* Total amount of space needed to store our copies of the machine's - register state, the array `registers'. */ + register state, the array `registers'. On the sparc, `registers' + contains the ins and locals, even though they are saved on the + stack rather than with the other registers, and this causes hair + and confusion in places like pop_frame. It probably would be + better to remove the ins and locals from `registers', make sure + that get_saved_register can get them from the stack (even in the + innermost frame), and make this the way to access them. For the + frame pointer we would do that via TARGET_READ_FP. */ + #define REGISTER_BYTES (32*4+32*4+8*4) /* Index within `registers' of the first byte of the space for -- 2.30.2