From c6e7f2fae020064048e6ab63b296524f199b46e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Charles Hannum Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1992 04:15:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] *** empty log message *** From-SVN: r1265 --- gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h b/gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h index 5992413a3fc..bac364b8755 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h +++ b/gcc/config/i386/sysv4.h @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ do { long value[2]; \ have a precedent to follow with respect to DWARF register numbers for x86 FP registers, but the SDB on x86/svr4 is so completely broken with respect to FP registers that it is hardly worth thinking - of it as something to strive for compatability with. + of it as something to strive for compatibility with. The verison of x86/svr4 SDB I have at the moment does (partially) seem to believe that DWARF register number 11 is associated with -- 2.30.2