From c9397e5758137b75940e9cefcaaae499f86e7326 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Marchi Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 10:10:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: remove MPFR detection in gdb.base/float128.exp I see this fail since commit 991180627851 ("Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb"): FAIL: gdb.base/float128.exp: show configuration The test fails to find --with-mpfr or --without-mpfr in the "show configuration" output. Since MPFR has become mandatory, we can just remove that check and simplify the test to assume MPFR support is there. Change-Id: I4f3458470db0029705b390dfefed3a66dfc0633a Approved-By: Tom de Vries --- gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/float128.exp | 37 +---------------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/float128.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/float128.exp index 21a1a99f6ee..73835942ab0 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/float128.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/float128.exp @@ -73,40 +73,5 @@ gdb_test_multiple "set var f128=20.375l" "$test" { gdb_test "print ld" ".* = 10\\.375.*" "the value of ld is changed to 10.375" gdb_test "print f128" ".* = 20\\.375.*" "the value of f128 is changed to 20.375" -set mpfr_supported -1 -gdb_test_multiple "show configuration" "" { - -wrap -re "--with-mpfr\r\n.*" { - set mpfr_supported 1 - } - -wrap -re "--without-mpfr\r\n.*" { - set mpfr_supported 0 - } -} - # Test that we can correctly handle the largest IEEE-128 value -# Note: If we get "inf" instead of the correct result, we may have run into -# an internal overflow. This typically happens on host platforms without -# native IEEE-128 support where GDB was built without MPFR support. -set test "print large128" -gdb_test_multiple "print large128" "$test" { - -re ".* = 1\\.18973149535723176508575932662800702e\\+4932.*$gdb_prompt $" { - pass "$test" - } - -re ".* = inf.*$gdb_prompt $" { - if { $mpfr_supported == 0 } { - # If the host platform has native 128-bit float support (as is - # the case for some versions of s390 and powerpc), the - # "print large128" test should be passing, even without MPFR - # support. So, in those cases we should have fail here rather than - # unsupported. However, given that we don't have a way to readily - # test for this, we fall back to unsupported. - unsupported "$test (Missing MPFR support)" - } else { - fail $test - } - } - -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { - fail "$test" - } -} - +gdb_test "print large128" ".* = 1\\.18973149535723176508575932662800702e\\+4932" -- 2.30.2